Re: [RFC] sdhci: fix DMA leaks [was: [SHDCI] Heavy (thousands) DMA leaks]

[Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>]

On 08/06/2015 02:17 AM, Chen Bough wrote:
> I will format a patch based on your diff file firstly. I will test this on my side,
> If any issue, like dma issue or performance issue, I will add some modification.
> Then I will send the patch for review, and you can test the patch on your platform.
>
> Best Regards
> Haibo Chen
>

Did I miss the follow up patch or is this still pending? If it's still pending,
would you mind Ccing me when it's available for testing?

Thanks,
Laura
  
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:jslaby@suse.cz]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 5:07 PM
>> To: Chen Haibo-B51421; Ulf Hansson
>> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Linux kernel mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [RFC] sdhci: fix DMA leaks [was: [SHDCI] Heavy (thousands)
>> DMA leaks]
>>
>> On 08/06/2015, 09:42 AM, Chen Bough wrote:
>>> I read your attached log and patch, yes, dma memory leak will happen
>>> when more than one pre_request execute. The method of ++next->cookie
>>> is not good, your patch seems good, but I still need some time to test
>>> the patch, because you unmap the dma in sdhci_finish_data rather than
>> the sdhci_post_req.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> yes, this is not correct. We can perhaps differentiate according to the
>> COOKIE value. Should I fix it or are you going to prepare a patch based
>> on my RFC?
>>
>> thanks,
>> --
>> js
>> suse labs