All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Sean Fu <fxinrong@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl.c: If "count" including the terminating byte '\0' the write system call should retrun success.
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:24:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DB8B95.7050005@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150824134408.be0ffaa654f7d26802119b81@linux-foundation.org>

This seems to be the relevant patch:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/5/104
Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>  2010-05-05 02:26:45
00b7c3395aec3df43de5bd02a3c5a099ca51169f
+static const char proc_wspace_sep[] = { ' ', '\t', '\n' };

So since 2010 we have the current behavior.

Best regards

Heinrich Schuchardt

On 24.08.2015 22:44, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:33:58 +0800 Sean Fu <fxinrong@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Eric W. Biederman
>> <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On August 24, 2015 1:56:13 AM PDT, Sean Fu <fxinrong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> when the input argument "count" including the terminating byte "\0",
>>>> The write system call return EINVAL on proc file.
>>>> But it return success on regular file.
>>>
>>> Nonsense.  It will write the '\0' to a regular file because it is just data.
>>>
>>> Integers in proc are more than data.
>>>
>>> So I see no justification for this change.
>> In fact, "write(fd, "1\0", 2)" on Integers proc file return success on
>> 2.6 kernel. I already tested it on 2.6.6.60 kernel.
>>
>> So, The latest behavior of "write(fd, "1\0", 2)" is different from old
>> kernel(2.6).
>> This maybe impact the compatibility of some user space program.
> 
> 2.6 was a long time ago.  If this behaviour change has happened in the
> last 1-2 kernel releases then there would be a case to consider making
> changes.  But if the kernel has been this way for two years then it's
> too late to bother switching back to the old (and strange) behaviour.
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-24 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-24  8:56 [PATCH] kernel/sysctl.c: If "count" including the terminating byte '\0' the write system call should retrun success Sean Fu
2015-08-24 12:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-24 15:33   ` Sean Fu
2015-08-24 20:44     ` Andrew Morton
2015-08-24 21:24       ` Heinrich Schuchardt [this message]
2015-08-24 16:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-25  0:57   ` Sean Fu
2015-08-25  2:24     ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-25  7:50       ` Sean Fu
2015-08-25 14:15         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-25 16:44           ` Sean Fu
2015-08-25 17:33             ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-08-25 19:05               ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-26 15:48                 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-26 20:36                   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-27  0:17                     ` Sean Fu
2015-08-27  2:32                       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-27  8:32                         ` Sean Fu
2015-08-28  3:31                           ` Sean Fu
2015-09-08  3:11                             ` Sean Fu
2015-09-08 15:17                               ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-08 16:19                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-08 16:36                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-11  9:05                                     ` Sean Fu
2015-09-11 13:49                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-11 17:01                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-13 12:39                                         ` Sean Fu
2015-09-13 16:44                                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-15  9:30                                             ` Sean Fu
2015-09-15 14:11                                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-13 20:05                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15  9:10                                             ` Sean Fu
2015-09-15 13:51                                               ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-25  3:12     ` Sean Fu
2015-08-25 20:39 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2015-08-26  9:30   ` Sean Fu
2015-08-27  0:32   ` Sean Fu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55DB8B95.7050005@gmx.de \
    --to=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=emunson@akamai.com \
    --cc=fxinrong@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.