From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 7EFFCE00C20; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:54:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.119 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx3.mail.bg (mx3.mail.bg [193.201.172.119]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA9DE00C12 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx3.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25EB32097863; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:53:47 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1440525227; bh=U/gLkCRVvxsB/pMkxSD21fD5WHYnwd7l73Za9p2N2Z0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=07A00RhM9Bt15HW9RORH9p7fGmiHmAA78XHxjktafbst5/CzaKmLxJAMh1zsoLh7y TIkf5PrvDU5Hpvz2DpUUnK9g7onjTOewa414js3mNur9tmdmJep8A7xgy9IdmBiBF1 Rqwkzy+u00/vijrOpnafv0bQRfwIeBw28LvcRvq8= Message-ID: <55DCABAB.5070204@mail.bg> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:53:47 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Dominic_Sacr=E9?= , meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: <1439991126-22900-1-git-send-email-ra43240@freescale.com> <1439991126-22900-3-git-send-email-ra43240@freescale.com> <55DC25D9.3010708@mail.bg> <55DC8081.10601@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <55DC8081.10601@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-demos][PATCH 01/12] packagegroup-fsl-benchmark.bb: New packagegroup for benchmarks X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:54:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Dominic, On 08/25/2015 05:49 PM, Dominic Sacré wrote: > On 2015-08-25 16:20, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >>> Can you please exclude "fio" from RDEPENDS_${PN}-extended, at least for >>> ARM boards? Here's more info about the issue: >>> >>> https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/commit/836bdf5a9d500ed258f1ddc07d89eca74a704098 >> >> This is the very same packagegroup as >> packagegroup-fsl-tools-benchmark; there are two differences though: >> >> a. it is split in core and extended >> b. it includes fio >> >> The core and extended for a benchmark packagegroup seems pointless as >> both offer same functionality. So I think what we have is more >> suitable for general use. >> >> I thus ask you to remove this patch for next patchset. The 'fio' >> package has been removed on purpose as it was causing builds to fail >> so if it needs to be added back a more careful test needs to be done >> before reverting the patch which has removed it. > > The issue with fio was just temporary (a QA fix for x86 broke ARM > builds) and is fixed in meta-openembedded master: > > https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/commit/eb01b36cb3f2f686bc05c690b06d1e0680dda1f5 > > There's no need to exclude fio from packagegroup-fsl-tools-benchmark. > > > Dominic > Thanks for sharing this! Regards, Nikolay