Thank you for the info, Dominic. Ann Thornton On 8/25/2015 9:49 AM, Dominic Sacré wrote: > On 2015-08-25 16:20, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >>> Can you please exclude "fio" from RDEPENDS_${PN}-extended, at least for >>> ARM boards? Here's more info about the issue: >>> >>> https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/commit/836bdf5a9d500ed258f1ddc07d89eca74a704098 >> This is the very same packagegroup as >> packagegroup-fsl-tools-benchmark; there are two differences though: >> >> a. it is split in core and extended >> b. it includes fio >> >> The core and extended for a benchmark packagegroup seems pointless as >> both offer same functionality. So I think what we have is more >> suitable for general use. >> >> I thus ask you to remove this patch for next patchset. The 'fio' >> package has been removed on purpose as it was causing builds to fail >> so if it needs to be added back a more careful test needs to be done >> before reverting the patch which has removed it. > The issue with fio was just temporary (a QA fix for x86 broke ARM > builds) and is fixed in meta-openembedded master: > > https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/commit/eb01b36cb3f2f686bc05c690b06d1e0680dda1f5 > > There's no need to exclude fio from packagegroup-fsl-tools-benchmark. > > > Dominic -- Ann Thornton /Microcontrollers Software and Applications Freescale Semiconductors email: Ann.Thornton@freescale.com/