From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"jason@lakedaemon.net" <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: "rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, "pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:43:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DD9838.20505@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C1C2579D7BE026428F81F41198ADB17237863E88@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Lukasz,
On 26/08/15 08:04, Anaczkowski, Lukasz wrote:
> On Monday, August 3, 2015 8:26 PM
> Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> v2: Fixed ARM64 syntax error
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> Does this patch look ok now?
Contrarily to popular belief, I do not read every email on LKML. Crazy,
I know. How about cc-ing me next time? Even your reply to my original
rant wasn't addressed to me (how did you manage that?)...
I'll have a look now.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-26 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507211017590.18576 () nanos>
2015-07-30 17:43 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle xapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-07-30 17:43 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-02 9:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-02 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-03 18:26 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-03 18:26 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26 7:04 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-08-26 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-08-26 11:42 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-08-26 12:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 17:49 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26 17:49 ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-27 9:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-08 11:07 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi: rename acpi_table_parse_entries Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86, arm64, acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] acpi: multi proc support Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 15:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 22:45 ` Al Stone
2015-09-09 7:01 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09 9:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 14:27 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09 15:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Marc Zyngier
2015-09-09 13:47 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 20:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-18 22:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-28 8:30 ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Ingo Molnar
2015-09-01 8:02 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-01 12:07 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-01 13:36 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-07 14:04 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-08 14:44 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-08-26 11:03 ` [PATCH] x86, " Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 11:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 12:56 ` Tomasz Nowicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DD9838.20505@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.