From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 791B6E00A49; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:59:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.119 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx3.mail.bg (mx3.mail.bg [193.201.172.119]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EAAE006D2 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx3.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D37A203E50A; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:58:53 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1440611933; bh=wTViqiaMM2qD0T3YNA8e4psL4FDtLCBfyyKFVSrj7SQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=B6TYAu9jJiAygr6O9BnoiggHbXwWrziWKEg6jYZWcrrAyfXEDcQ8ckdpR06DDYyD4 3M5z6uSywxoYVAFRFGXX1DPCnXc00YFOX6voyi7CURbYt9jt6g7AjwceM8yl+ElXI5 PoR64PHVs6BX3+7GtPu8hdbgeRAs/iR5JQecZxyg= Message-ID: <55DDFE5C.8070305@mail.bg> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:58:52 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador , =?UTF-8?B?RG9taW5p?= =?UTF-8?B?YyBTYWNyw6k=?= References: <1439991126-22900-1-git-send-email-ra43240@freescale.com> <1439991126-22900-3-git-send-email-ra43240@freescale.com> <55DC25D9.3010708@mail.bg> <55DC8081.10601@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-demos][PATCH 01/12] packagegroup-fsl-benchmark.bb: New packagegroup for benchmarks X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:59:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi guys, On 08/25/2015 08:06 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Dominic Sacré wrote: >> On 2015-08-25 16:20, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >>>> Can you please exclude "fio" from RDEPENDS_${PN}-extended, at least for >>>> ARM boards? Here's more info about the issue: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/commit/836bdf5a9d500ed258f1ddc07d89eca74a704098 >>> >>> This is the very same packagegroup as >>> packagegroup-fsl-tools-benchmark; there are two differences though: >>> >>> a. it is split in core and extended >>> b. it includes fio >>> >>> The core and extended for a benchmark packagegroup seems pointless as >>> both offer same functionality. So I think what we have is more >>> suitable for general use. >>> >>> I thus ask you to remove this patch for next patchset. The 'fio' >>> package has been removed on purpose as it was causing builds to fail >>> so if it needs to be added back a more careful test needs to be done >>> before reverting the patch which has removed it. >> >> The issue with fio was just temporary (a QA fix for x86 broke ARM >> builds) and is fixed in meta-openembedded master: >> >> https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/commit/eb01b36cb3f2f686bc05c690b06d1e0680dda1f5 >> >> There's no need to exclude fio from packagegroup-fsl-tools-benchmark. > > This is indeed what I thought and it must to be proper tested so we > can revert the patch which removes it with a proper commit log. As you > been testing it, can you propose the revert? > Just did a fresh build and can confirm that now fio compiles OK on master and fido for all supported ARM machines. Btw I won't be able to test the package. If someone can test it, please share. Also, if noone else wants to revert my patch, I can do it :D. Regards, Nikolay