From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 96984E00AD1; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:07:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.117 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx1.mail.bg (mx1.mail.bg [193.201.172.117]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38D4E00A92 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.84] (85-118-69-249.mtel.net [85.118.69.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F1AD6001AC1; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:07:45 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1440619665; bh=aoP/A/G6exAVAc4Xv8SKC7KXlu7FOcBUfn1nkgAJvxs=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rRWl24CVe5elSOGcYxOA0OvRv9RzoPwljhpAmKujzS6nDkWVGx1WzXDk7sIFil2St 1X19xGamhOzh/vF1sSnfV8orOQXdI8Fa21e30QYcb/6CYfz4Q/U+JiCybTCS2bInaw qLNiaFn8lqcAD7NdykdJVNEek4J1cfyWS99gjNRM= Message-ID: <55DE1C8F.3060206@mail.bg> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 23:07:43 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lenivyy Viktor , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" References: <1c7f82d0d8884768b0906a80047289dd@E2013a.CORP.ICS.COM.UA> In-Reply-To: <1c7f82d0d8884768b0906a80047289dd@E2013a.CORP.ICS.COM.UA> Subject: Re: FW: How to recreate rootfs image X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:07:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Victor, On 08/26/2015 08:12 PM, Lenivyy Viktor wrote: > This command did what I was trying to avoid: remove Yocto's copy of kernel sources. But starting questions still exist. > In your kernel recipe are you using SRC_URI to fetch from a git repository (e.g. git:// URI) or from a local directory? I guess that if you're using a local path, there can be either some uncommitted changes, or a stale git index. You can try just for the experiment to add your current kernel sources to a test git repo and point the SRC_URI to it, so bitbake can clone the repo by git revision (SRCREV = "${AUTOREV}" will skip the need to update the recipe revision constantly during development). This should work fine, without the "-dirty" version suffix. Regards, Nikolay