Re: [kernel] powerpc/iommu: Set default DMA offset in dma_dev_setup

[Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>]

On 08/27/2015 07:37 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-27-08 at 06:01:16 UTC, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> "powerpc/iommu: Cleanup setting of DMA base/offset" expects that
>
> This should be:
>
> Commit e91c25111aa3 "powerpc/iommu: Cleanup setting of DMA base/offset" ...

Is not this format for reverts (which this patch is not)?

>
>> the default DMA offset is set from pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() which
>> is correct unless it is SRIOV where the code flow is different - at
>> the moment when pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() is called, there is no PE for
>> the just created VF.
>>
>> This adds missing set_dma_offset() to pnv_pci_ioda_dma_dev_setup()
>> to cover the case of SRIOV.
>>
>> Note that we still need set_dma_offset() in pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma()
>> as at the boot time pnv_pci_ioda_dma_dev_setup() is called when no PE
>> was created yet, this happens at the PHB fixup stage.
>
> And here we should have:
>
> Fixes: e91c25111aa3 ("powerpc/iommu: Cleanup setting of DMA base/offset")
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Makes sense to squash it to "powerpc/iommu: Cleanup setting of DMA base/offset".
>
> We don't squash things that are already in next.


imho this screams for rebase. There is no point in having broken patches in 
non merged tree, rebase is a very cheap operation.


>
> I've fixed the change log up with my comments above and your reworded
> explanation.

Thanks!

>
> cheers
>


-- 
Alexey