From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <55DF43C6.2080209@xenomai.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:07:18 -0400
From: Jorge Ramirez Ortiz <jro@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJqUr7ybpmgOev-iPaQ-iMEAF8SBocn54vyYSbLcm9spMY=FBg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJqUr7ybpmgOev-iPaQ-iMEAF8SBocn54vyYSbLcm9spMY=FBg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] xenomai/ipipe arm64 port
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: don@mperpetuo.com
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org

On 08/24/2015 08:13 PM, Don Mahurin wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We would like to submit our current work on the arm64 port of
> ipipe/xenomai. We hope that this contribution will encourage further
> development of arm64 support in ipipe/xenomai.
> 
> This port was largely developed on ipipe-3.10 as a base, so it is likely to
> be the most well tested there. Though recently, we have also ported these
> changes to ipipe-3.14.44. ( We noticed that 3.10 is missing from rc7. Is
> this intended, or will 3.10 support return? )
> 
> At the end of this message are the relevant git repos and branches for the
> arm64 port. Also included is a build script to build a minimal busybox
> linux system which may be ran using qemu (arm64 virt).
> 
> 
> Development status:
> 
> The 3.14 port is missing the fast-syscall changes (in entry.S) from armv7,
> and instead contains the 3.10 entry.S changes forward ported to 3.14.


is the IPIPE tracing supported?