From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [xen 4.6 retrospective] [good] Feedback from developer meeting Wed 19th : What went well in 4.6 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:01:27 +0100 Message-ID: <55E077C7.2010602@citrix.com> References: <26D219F1-90EF-4A2B-836E-8480782D4A95@gmail.com> <55E08F94020000780009DDF1@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVLAC-0000ni-EP for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:01:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: <55E08F94020000780009DDF1@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , Lars Kurth Cc: xen devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 28/08/15 15:43, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 28.08.15 at 14:28, wrote: >> * Testing: staging and master being close together for most of the cycle > This was observed or said by whom? I've certainly got - not > infrequently - a different impression. I second the query. The 4.6 development period has had two different occasions when staging and master have been more than a month apart. The trend is definitely getting worse, not better. ~Andrew