From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVLrc-0008LE-2V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:46:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVLrY-0006SJ-Ss for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:46:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVLrY-0006S9-NF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:46:44 -0400 References: <55A25B32.5080203@suse.de> <55DF9368.2040606@suse.de> <55DFE17C.6050509@twiddle.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Message-ID: <55E0826A.9070906@suse.de> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:46:50 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55DFE17C.6050509@twiddle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Peter Crosthwaite , Mark Cave-Ayland , Alexander Graf , Peter Crosthwaite Am 27.08.2015 um 22:20 schrieb Richard Henderson: > On 08/27/2015 03:47 PM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: >> Am 12.07.2015 um 06:18 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber: >>> Am 12.07.2015 um 03:59 schrieb Peter Crosthwaite: >>>> Continue QOMifying target-specific disassembly. Convert all arches >>>> except for >>>> X86 and PPC. They will be round 3 and are non-trivial. >>>> >>>> This brings us close to no arch-specific code in disas.c allow >>>> conversion to >>>> common-obj and preparing these arches for inclusion in multi-arch. >>> >>> I was about to say that this is for individual target maintainers now= , >>> for lack of CPUClass changes, but I guess they'll collide in disas.c.= .. >>> >>> Once it's reviewed I can queue it on qom-cpu-next, unless Peter or >>> someone wants to. >> >> I have queued them on qom-cpu-next now (subjects to be adjusted), but = I >> am still missing acks for s390x, moxie, sparc and alpha. >=20 > Really? I thought I'd given them ages ago. For s390 and alpha at leas= t, >=20 > Acked-by: Richard Henderson Ah, you may have done so on IRC when we discussed who was supposed to handle them, so they didn't show up here. Updated. Two to go, moxie as the next one untested by Peter. Thanks, Andreas --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=F6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N=FC= rnberg)