All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@huawei.com>,
	qemu-stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>,
	Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tcg/aarch64: Fix tcg_out_qemu_{ld, st} for linux-user
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:23:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E08AEE.3060308@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55DFE3CC.4030806@twiddle.net>

Am 27.08.2015 um 22:30 schrieb Richard Henderson:
> On 08/27/2015 04:47 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> The argument order for the !CONFIG_SOFTMMU case was jumbled up since
>> ffc6372851d8631a9f9fa56ec613b3244dc635b9 ("tcg/aarch64: use 32-bit
>> offset for 32-bit user-mode emulation"), regressing from -rc2 to v2.4.0.
>> Fix their order to avoid segfaults, e.g., in openSUSE's GNU coreutils
>> 8.24.
> 
> Nack.  The argument order is correct, that is...
> 
>> -    tcg_out_qemu_ld_direct(s, memop, ext, data_reg,
>> -                           guest_base ? TCG_REG_GUEST_BASE :
>> TCG_REG_XZR,
>> -                           otype, addr_reg);
>> +    tcg_out_qemu_ld_direct(s, memop, ext, data_reg, addr_reg, otype,
>> +                           guest_base ? TCG_REG_GUEST_BASE :
>> TCG_REG_XZR);
> 
> TCG_REG_GUEST_BASE is definitely the "base" register, holding a 64-bit
> host address, while addr_reg is the "offset" register, holding a
> (potentially) 32-bit guest address.  It is (supposed to be) the "offset"
> register to which the zero-extend is applied.

Huh? Please see
http://git.qemu-project.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blobdiff;f=tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.c;h=4aca883b8e78b2cae6ec22c19a74f0fa9bc22bfe;hp=d1c550886a461581f93c34d5beead2b3ddfebde5;hb=ffc6372851d8631a9f9fa56ec613b3244dc635b9;hpb=6c0f0c0f124718650a8d682ba275044fc02f6fe2

@@ -1210,12 +1210,15 @@ static void tcg_out_qemu_ld(TCGContext *s,
TCGReg data_reg, TCGReg addr_reg,
tcg_insn_unit *label_ptr;

tcg_out_tlb_read(s, addr_reg, s_bits, &label_ptr, mem_index, 1);
- tcg_out_qemu_ld_direct(s, memop, ext, data_reg, addr_reg, TCG_REG_X1);
+ tcg_out_qemu_ld_direct(s, memop, ext, data_reg, addr_reg,
+ TCG_TYPE_I64, TCG_REG_X1);
add_qemu_ldst_label(s, true, oi, ext, data_reg, addr_reg,
s->code_ptr, label_ptr);
#else /* !CONFIG_SOFTMMU */
- tcg_out_qemu_ld_direct(s, memop, ext, data_reg, addr_reg,
- GUEST_BASE ? TCG_REG_GUEST_BASE : TCG_REG_XZR);
+ const TCGType otype = TARGET_LONG_BITS == 64 ? TCG_TYPE_I64 :
TCG_TYPE_I32;
+ tcg_out_qemu_ld_direct(s, memop, ext, data_reg,
+ GUEST_BASE ? TCG_REG_GUEST_BASE : TCG_REG_XZR,
+ otype, addr_reg);
#endif /* CONFIG_SOFTMMU */
}

@@ -1229,12 +1232,15 @@ static void tcg_out_qemu_st(TCGContext *s,
TCGReg data_reg, TCGReg addr_reg,
tcg_insn_unit *label_ptr;

tcg_out_tlb_read(s, addr_reg, s_bits, &label_ptr, mem_index, 0);
- tcg_out_qemu_st_direct(s, memop, data_reg, addr_reg, TCG_REG_X1);
+ tcg_out_qemu_st_direct(s, memop, data_reg, addr_reg,
+ TCG_TYPE_I64, TCG_REG_X1);
add_qemu_ldst_label(s, false, oi, s_bits == MO_64, data_reg, addr_reg,
s->code_ptr, label_ptr);
#else /* !CONFIG_SOFTMMU */
- tcg_out_qemu_st_direct(s, memop, data_reg, addr_reg,
- GUEST_BASE ? TCG_REG_GUEST_BASE : TCG_REG_XZR);
+ const TCGType otype = TARGET_LONG_BITS == 64 ? TCG_TYPE_I64 :
TCG_TYPE_I32;
+ tcg_out_qemu_st_direct(s, memop, data_reg,
+ GUEST_BASE ? TCG_REG_GUEST_BASE : TCG_REG_XZR,
+ otype, addr_reg);
#endif /* CONFIG_SOFTMMU */
}


An otype argument is being inserted as next-to-last argument for the
function definitions. Same for the softmmu callsites. Only in the *-user
callsites the argument order is being changed with addr_reg and off_r
switching order? I don't see why that should be done in this patch. If
it was wrong before, it should've been done in a separate patch.

> If something's wrong, and I'm not currently in a position to verify one
> way or another, it's in tcg_out_insn_3310.

git-bisect pointed to the above commit. You are referring to its
predecessor
http://git.qemu-project.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=6c0f0c0f124718650a8d682ba275044fc02f6fe2
? Don't spot anything obviously wrong there immediately...

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-28 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-27 23:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tcg/aarch64: Fix tcg_out_qemu_{ld, st} for linux-user Andreas Färber
2015-08-28  4:30 ` Richard Henderson
2015-08-28 16:23   ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2015-08-29  5:33     ` Richard Henderson
2015-08-29  6:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-01 16:31   ` Andreas Färber
2015-09-01 20:09     ` Richard Henderson
2015-09-02  9:02     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-02 14:26       ` Richard Henderson
2015-09-02 14:38       ` Andreas Färber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55E08AEE.3060308@suse.de \
    --to=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=claudio.fontana@huawei.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.