From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id AD565E00BE7; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:08:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [192.36.1.252 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mx-3.enea.com (sestofw01.enea.se [192.36.1.252]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2451FE00A7D for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.140.15] (172.16.140.15) by smtp.enea.com (172.21.1.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:08:13 +0200 Message-ID: <55E3FD5D.4040200@enea.com> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:08:13 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yYSBCasO2cmtsdW5k?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luo Zhenhua , "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" References: <55CB59D7.7030900@enea.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [172.16.140.15] Subject: Re: Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:08:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Zhenhua, Thank you for your reply. Are there any plans to upstream a machine=20 definition to meta-fsl-ppc for t2081? Best regards, Nora On 2015-08-18 12:08, Luo Zhenhua wrote: > Hi Nora, > > T2081QDS is a different board from T2080QDS board (Pins of T2081 are not = compatible with T2080), T2081 uses different RCW, u-boot, dts images from T= 2080. T2081 uses same kernel image as T2080. So a new machine definition is= needed for T2081. > > > Best Regards, > > Zhenhua > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale- >> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Nora Bj?rklund >> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:36 PM >> To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> Subject: [meta-freescale] Is a machine definition for t2081 necessary >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a question concerning the meta-fsl-ppc layer and T2081; >> >> I want to build the yocto project for the t2081 machine, however there i= s no >> machine definition for it in meta-fsl-ppc/conf/machine, just for t2080. = Looking >> at the specification for the targets they seem very similar (t2081 being= a >> "smaller" version of t2080). Is it OK to use the >> t2080 machine definition or is a t2081 definition necessary? >> >> Best regards, >> Nora Bj=C3=B6rklund >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> meta-freescale mailing list >> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale