From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20150831111046.GD8044@bukuli-linux.Protecta.local> <55E44B07.1050402@xenomai.org> From: Philippe Gerum Message-ID: <55E44C72.1070503@xenomai.org> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:45:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55E44B07.1050402@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Current state of Freescale LS1021A Xenomai support List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bukuli Norbert , xenomai@xenomai.org On 08/31/2015 02:39 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 08/31/2015 01:10 PM, Bukuli Norbert wrote: >> Hello, Everyone! >> >> I have a few questions about the current state of Freescale LS1021A >> SoC and TWR-LS1021A evaluation board support. >> >> I saw on the website, that the `QorIQ LS1: LS1021' SoC is supported, >> but I could not figure out, what line of Xenomai supports it. The >> stable one (2.6) or the upcoming release (3)? >> >> I prefer the dual-kernel architecture, because of our application >> strict realtime needs, so I need a Xenomai supported version. >> >> The linux kernel found in Freescale BSP is derived from v3.12.37, >> which is currently not supported by Xenomai. On the other hand, >> xenomai supported linux kernel versions (3.8.13, 3.10.32, 3.14.17) >> don't have LS1021 support. >> >> Newer vanilla kernels support LS1021A, but there are no i-pipe patches >> for those versions. >> >> Any documentation, git trees, and corresponding information would >> be highly appreciated. > > The port was done over a custom 3.14.44 kernel targeting the ls1. You > may need to port the I-pipe over 3.19+, or wait for the customer to > release these bits. > Alternatively you could forward port ipipe-3.10 to 3.12-fsl. -- Philippe.