From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lizefan@huawei.com, pi3orama@163.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf tools: Fix cross compiling error
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 21:43:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E4A066.5070404@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150831142031.GA663@kernel.org>
On 31/08/2015 5:20 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:09:41PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
>> Cross compiling perf to other platform failed due to missing symbol:
>
> Adrian, I think this one covers what you would resend, no? If it does,
> can I have your Acked-by?
There was another chunk as well so I sent V2 of the other patch.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>> ...
>> AR /pathofperf/libperf.a
>> LD /pathofperf/tests/perf-in.o
>> LD /pathofperf/perf-in.o
>> LINK /pathofperf/perf
>> /pathofperf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_branch_sample':
>> /usr/src/kernel/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:899: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time'
>> /pathofperf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_transaction_sample':
>> /usr/src/kernel/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:992: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time'
>> /pathofperf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): In function `intel_pt_synth_instruction_sample':
>> /usr/src/kernel/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c:943: undefined reference to `tsc_to_perf_time'
>> ...
>>
>> This is because we allow newly introduced intel-pt-decoder to be
>> compiled to not only X86, but tsc.c which required by it is compiled
>> for x86 only.
>>
>> This patch fix the compiling error by allow tsc.c to be compiled if
>> CONFIG_AUXTRACE is set, no matter the target platform.
>>
>> Comment from Arnaldo:
>>
>> There were some changes in this area, i.e. x86 needs tsc, and auxtrace
>> as well, so both should express that via:
>>
>> libperf-$(CONFIG_X86) += tsc.o
>> libperf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += tsc.o
>>
>> Because on !x86 we want to process perf.data files containing Intel PT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
>> index fd2f084..e712311 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/Build
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
>> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ libperf-y += record.o
>> libperf-y += srcline.o
>> libperf-y += data.o
>> libperf-$(CONFIG_X86) += tsc.o
>> +libperf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += tsc.o
>> libperf-y += cloexec.o
>> libperf-y += thread-stack.o
>> libperf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += auxtrace.o
>> --
>> 1.8.3.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-31 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 14:09 [PATCH v2] perf tools: Fix cross compiling error Wang Nan
2015-08-31 14:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-08-31 18:43 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E4A066.5070404@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.