From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZWxB6-00033V-Bm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:49:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZWxB3-0000uJ-3h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:49:32 -0400 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=38988 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZWxB2-0000tM-P7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:49:29 -0400 Message-ID: <55E6559E.5060305@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:49:18 +0800 From: Yang Hongyang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1441098383-22585-1-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1441098383-22585-6-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150901144308.GE2407@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150901144308.GE2407@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 05/10] move out net queue structs define List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: thuth@redhat.com, zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com, jasowang@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com, armbru@redhat.com On 09/01/2015 10:43 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:06:18PM +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote: >> This will be used by the next patch in this series. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth >> --- >> include/net/queue.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ >> net/queue.c | 19 ------------------- >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/net/queue.h b/include/net/queue.h >> index fc02b33..1d65e47 100644 >> --- a/include/net/queue.h >> +++ b/include/net/queue.h >> @@ -31,6 +31,25 @@ typedef struct NetQueue NetQueue; >> >> typedef void (NetPacketSent) (NetClientState *sender, ssize_t ret); >> >> +struct NetPacket { >> + QTAILQ_ENTRY(NetPacket) entry; >> + NetClientState *sender; >> + unsigned flags; >> + int size; >> + NetPacketSent *sent_cb; >> + uint8_t data[0]; >> +}; >> + >> +struct NetQueue { >> + void *opaque; >> + uint32_t nq_maxlen; >> + uint32_t nq_count; >> + >> + QTAILQ_HEAD(packets, NetPacket) packets; >> + >> + unsigned delivering:1; >> +}; >> + > > Why is it necessary to expose both structs? In next patch, we add a API to pass the packet to next filter: ssize_t qemu_netfilter_pass_to_next(NetFilterState *nf, NetPacket *packet); which will access the internals of NetPacket. and in buffer filter, we need the NetQueue to Queue packets, and also to access queue->packets(pass this packets to next filter). > > Normally functions would be added to maintain the abstraction. Instead, > you have chosen to access the fields directly - this is probably a bad > idea. > . > -- Thanks, Yang.