From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39670)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1ZX906-00061E-0j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:26:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1ZX905-0007rT-9k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:26:57 -0400
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
References: <1440719254-12349-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de>
	<55E15650.7020802@redhat.com> <55E5D2FA.30908@suse.de>
	<55E6BB36.7060005@redhat.com>
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Message-ID: <55E706FC.3020002@twiddle.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 07:26:04 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55E6BB36.7060005@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tcg/aarch64: Fix tcg_out_qemu_{ld,
	st} for linux-user
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@huawei.com>, qemu-stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On 09/02/2015 02:02 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 01/09/2015 18:31, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Breaking stderr log attached. Diff below.
>>
>> ffc6372851d8631a9f9fa56ec613b3244dc635b9^ vs.
>> ffc6372851d8631a9f9fa56ec613b3244dc635b9:
>
> Richard already answered (and sent a patch), but I also have a question:
> are you using --disable-guest-base, and if so why?

Depending on the (non) overlap of host and guest addresses, 64-bit guests tend 
to auto-select guest_base == 0.


r~