From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZXD3J-0003Ba-1Z for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 18:46:33 +0000 Subject: Re: HT80 monitoring using ath10k References: From: Ben Greear Message-ID: <55E743F3.1060802@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 11:46:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Yeoh Chun-Yeow , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" On 09/01/2015 06:20 PM, Yeoh Chun-Yeow wrote: > Hi, all > > Anyone has able to capture the packet sent using HT80 or even higher > putting ath10k in monitor mode? > > Please let me know. Thanks I guess it would require wave-2 hardware to even have a chance of HT160? I thought HT80 capture worked fine on peregrine....I should have a chance to try this for some upcoming IBSS work I have scheduled for my 10.1 firmware. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k