All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: 795330-forwarded@bugs.debian.org,
	"Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>,
	795330@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#795330: Suggests noapic but doesn't support it
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:22:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E9A92A.5060506@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441376032.26292.520.camel@debian.org>

On 04/09/15 15:13, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 15:04 +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 04/09/15 14:38, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Control: tag -1 upstream 
>>>
>>> Jan/Andy & David,
>>>
>>> Is there anything we can improve here on either the Xen or kernel side 
>>> do
>>> you think?
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 00:59 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>>>> Package: xen-hypervisor-4.5-amd64
>>>> Severity: normal
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> when running xen inside of kvm the hypervisor fails to set up the 
>>>> proper
>>>> IRQ routing and suggests to use noapic.
>>>
>>> FTR, it seems to say:
>>>
>>>     panic("IO-APIC + timer doesn't work!  Boot with 
>>> apic_verbosity=debug "
>>>           "and send a report.  Then try booting with the 'noapic' 
>>> option");
>>
>> This is the Linux kernel making a recommendation for its command line.
> 
> I cut-n-paste that message from xen.git. Although maybe in a file which
> originates in Linux.
> 
> (So now I realised I don't really know which entity was complaining)

Oh, in which case removing (from Xen) the recommendation to try noapic
might be useful.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-04 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20150812225926.GA9350@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
2015-09-04 13:38 ` [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#795330: Suggests noapic but doesn't support it Ian Campbell
2015-09-04 14:04   ` David Vrabel
2015-09-04 14:13     ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-04 14:22       ` David Vrabel [this message]
2015-09-04 15:37         ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-04 15:27       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55E9A92A.5060506@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=795330-forwarded@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=795330@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ijc@debian.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.