From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1ZZ4eg-0000vn-If for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 18:12:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40314) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZ4ed-0000tU-VG for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 18:12:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZ4ea-0005v7-Pr for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 18:12:47 -0400 Received: from rgout0401.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.214]:21940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZ4ea-0005rX-I9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 18:12:44 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.65] (86.184.233.190) by rgout04.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as ashton.models@btinternet.com) id 559E401306A5956B; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:38:59 +0100 Subject: Re: grub-lnstall option (UEFI) for chainloading References: <5517EBD8.8070901@zen.co.uk> <20150329161224.5192abb7@opensuse.site> <5519183F.2040509@gmail.com> <5571AA84.9060105@zen.co.uk> <20150606113831.44c54ebd@opensuse.site> To: Andrei Borzenkov From: Barry Jackson Message-ID: <55EE0413.6010800@zen.co.uk> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:39:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150606113831.44c54ebd@opensuse.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows NT kernel [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 65.20.0.214 Cc: grub-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 22:12:48 -0000 On 06/06/15 09:38, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > =D0=92 Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:56:20 +0100 > Barry Jackson =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> Any progress on this? >> > > > Not really, sorry. Do you have any suggestion how such option should be > named? > Sorry for delay - this got lost in the noise. Well something like --no-id-or-nvram ?? Not really bothered about the name! :)