From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZJAa-0005M3-WC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 09:42:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZJAX-0007KI-5U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 09:42:44 -0400 Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:31185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZJAX-0007Jo-0D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 09:42:41 -0400 References: <1440703987-29012-1-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com> <1440703987-29012-5-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com> From: Leon Alrae Message-ID: <55EEE5C8.6030507@imgtec.com> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:42:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1440703987-29012-5-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/9] mips: remove muldiv64() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laurent Vivier , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno On 27/08/15 20:33, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Originally, timers were ticks based, and it made sense to > add ticks to current time to know when to trigger an alarm. > > But since commit: > > 7447545 change all other clock references to use nanosecond resolution accessors > > All timers use nanoseconds and we need to convert ticks to nanoseconds, by > doing something like: > > y = muldiv64(x, get_ticks_per_sec(), TIMER_FREQ) > > where x is the number of device ticks and y the number of system ticks. > > y is used as nanoseconds in timer functions, > it works because 1 tick is 1 nanosecond. > (get_ticks_per_sec() is 10^9) > > But as MIPS timer frequency is 100 MHz, we can also do: > > y = x * 10; /* 100 MHz period is 10 ns */ > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier > --- > hw/mips/cputimer.c | 19 ++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Leon Alrae