Re: pull request labels : related to

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1781 bytes --]

Hi Greg,

You're right, it's a bad idea. I reverted the change.

Cheers

On 08/09/2015 15:46, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wen thru all pull request looking for those not related to anything (like having "bug fix" without "core" or "rgw"). Now that there are many labels, it's not trivial for someone not used to Ceph to sort out what's what. We really have three kinds of labels:
>>
>>  * those that relate the pull request to an area / component of Ceph (rgw, core, etc.)
>>  * those used to remember at what stage of QA the pull request is (wip-* and needs*qa)
>>  * those that describe the kind of pull request (cleanup, bug fix, performance etc.)
>>
>> To help reading the label I prefixed the names of rgw, core, etc. with "related to". If someone think that's not helpful or too long to read, feel free to revert, it's just a proposal.
> 
> You broke all my bookmarked searches. :( I've updated them now but I'm
> really not sure this change is helpful — in particular, we don't need
> these labels to make sense to people who aren't used to Ceph and it's
> impossible to have them quickly auto-complete now with a long shared
> prefix across them all...
> -Greg
> 
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> P.S. For backport snippets that set the component to "core" we'll need to change that to "related to core" instead. Not too much of an inconvenience IMHO but ...
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]