From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
To: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
hare@suse.com, jthumshirn@suse.de, JBottomley@Parallels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] Update soc driver to use new ida helper functions
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:01:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EF0675.7060601@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <145dc6d9918fe55a50afd10e22b336a041e8f692.1441416572.git.lduncan@suse.com>
Oops. I see the subject is wrong on this patch.
I will wait for comments (if any) then re-submit the sequence.
On 09/06/2015 10:59 AM, Lee Duncan wrote:
> This simplifies the calling sequence to
> acquire and to release an ida-managed index.
>
> Note that the ida_destroy() calls here previously
> had no locking, so this may close a race condition
> when errors occur or when removing a soc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/soc.c | 17 +++--------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/soc.c b/drivers/base/soc.c
> index 39fca01c8fa1..7b632f086524 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/soc.c
> @@ -122,18 +122,7 @@ struct soc_device *soc_device_register(struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr
> }
>
> /* Fetch a unique (reclaimable) SOC ID. */
> - do {
> - if (!ida_pre_get(&soc_ida, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out2;
> - }
> -
> - spin_lock(&soc_lock);
> - ret = ida_get_new(&soc_ida, &soc_dev->soc_dev_num);
> - spin_unlock(&soc_lock);
> -
> - } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
> -
> + ret = ida_get_index(&soc_ida, &soc_lock, &soc_dev->soc_dev_num);
> if (ret)
> goto out2;
>
> @@ -151,7 +140,7 @@ struct soc_device *soc_device_register(struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr
> return soc_dev;
>
> out3:
> - ida_remove(&soc_ida, soc_dev->soc_dev_num);
> + ida_put_index(&soc_ida, &sock_lock, soc_dev->soc_dev_num);
> out2:
> kfree(soc_dev);
> out1:
> @@ -161,7 +150,7 @@ out1:
> /* Ensure soc_dev->attr is freed prior to calling soc_device_unregister. */
> void soc_device_unregister(struct soc_device *soc_dev)
> {
> - ida_remove(&soc_ida, soc_dev->soc_dev_num);
> + ida_put_index(&soc_ida, &sock_lock, soc_dev->soc_dev_num);
>
> device_unregister(&soc_dev->dev);
> }
>
--
Lee Duncan
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-08 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-06 17:59 [PATCH 0/6] Create ida helpers and use them Lee Duncan
2015-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] Add ida helper routines Lee Duncan
2015-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] SCSI: Update sd driver to use new ida helper functions Lee Duncan
2015-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] Update soc " Lee Duncan
2015-09-08 16:01 ` Lee Duncan [this message]
2015-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] " Lee Duncan
2015-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] Update nvme-core " Lee Duncan
2015-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] Update rsxx core " Lee Duncan
2015-09-14 11:11 ` [PATCH 0/6] Create ida helpers and use them Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55EF0675.7060601@suse.com \
--to=lduncan@suse.com \
--cc=JBottomley@Parallels.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.