diff for duplicates of <55EF86A7.10306@rock-chips.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index a61e795..402234d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Hi Heiko: -On 2015年09月09日 06:46, Heiko Stübner wrote: +On 2015???09???09??? 06:46, Heiko St??bner wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Am Dienstag, 8. September 2015, 20:43:07 schrieb Andy Yan: @@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ On 2015年09月09日 06:46, Heiko Stübner wrote: > action. Nowadays this is uboot, but still a rockchip-specific fork. And we're > actively moving away from that, with the recent rk3288 addition to mainline > uboot. -  Sorry, I don't know about this action before, but this is really a +? ? Sorry, I don't know about this action before, but this is really a very convenient way -  to get machine enter download mode, it seems that many Android devices -  have this function to support commands like "reboot recovery", +? ? to get machine enter download mode, it seems that many Android devices +? ? have this function to support commands like "reboot recovery", "reboot fastboot". -  Why should we moving away from that? +? ? Why should we moving away from that? > So unless you convince uboot people that the _underlying special > functionality_ behind these flags should be part of uboot, I don't think this > is going to fly. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e8b1fa8..fed1445 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,22 +1,14 @@ "ref\01441716187-29446-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com\0" "ref\09364768.6AeuYh3EEP@diego\0" - "From\0Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: set rockchip-specific uboot bootmode flags on reboot\0" + "From\0andy.yan@rock-chips.com (Andy Yan)\0" + "Subject\0set rockchip-specific uboot bootmode flags on reboot\0" "Date\0Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:08:55 +0800\0" - "To\0Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>\0" - "Cc\0linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - linux@arm.linux.org.uk - olof@lixom.net - khilman@linaro.org - Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> - " arnd@arndb.de\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Heiko:\n" "\n" - "On 2015\303\245\302\271\302\26409\303\246\302\234\302\21009\303\246\302\227\302\245 06:46, Heiko St\303\203\302\274bner wrote:\n" + "On 2015???09???09??? 06:46, Heiko St??bner wrote:\n" "> Hi Andy,\n" ">\n" "> Am Dienstag, 8. September 2015, 20:43:07 schrieb Andy Yan:\n" @@ -58,12 +50,12 @@ "> action. Nowadays this is uboot, but still a rockchip-specific fork. And we're\n" "> actively moving away from that, with the recent rk3288 addition to mainline\n" "> uboot.\n" - "\303\202 \303\202 Sorry, I don't know about this action before, but this is really a \n" + "? ? Sorry, I don't know about this action before, but this is really a \n" "very convenient way\n" - "\303\202 \303\202 to get machine enter download mode, it seems that many Android devices\n" - "\303\202 \303\202 have this function to support commands like \"reboot recovery\", \n" + "? ? to get machine enter download mode, it seems that many Android devices\n" + "? ? have this function to support commands like \"reboot recovery\", \n" "\"reboot fastboot\".\n" - "\303\202 \303\202 Why should we moving away from that?\n" + "? ? Why should we moving away from that?\n" "> So unless you convince uboot people that the _underlying special\n" "> functionality_ behind these flags should be part of uboot, I don't think this\n" "> is going to fly.\n" @@ -102,4 +94,4 @@ ">\n" > -4cb2c7e7bfd4981d3a24cd771049733f3ebac5b50eb910fc4ccee44a0ce53a9d +2ae7e975a97d0053f9303bf14c9d0098374a112ba6c40e602b63f709d9d760dd
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.