From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZZk1B-0001Ug-Mn for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:22:50 +0000 Message-ID: <55F078E4.2050409@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:22:28 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: WLE600VX from PCEngines References: <55EFCFC8.4050303@cttc.es> <55F01104.6010600@tu-bs.de> <55F01328.4070403@cttc.es> <55F014CF.6090809@tu-bs.de> In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: "Marcel H." , ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 09/09/2015 04:40 AM, Marcel H. wrote: > One other things comes to mind - whats the relationship between the > Candelatech's kernel branch and the kvalo's > https://github.com/kvalo/ath/ ? > Using the 'main' firmware for ath10k (to support IBSS ad-hoc mode) Im > not entirely sure which kernel is leading development of the ath10k > driver. CT kernels are normally based on upstream (Linus) kernels, but I do sometimes grab patches from kvalo/ath. In general, CT kernels have support for some additional features that CT firmware provides (that are not necessarily available in official ath10k firmware). > > Also, is 636 firmware the best / latest / recommended the most for the > IBSS mode? Or shall I have a look into other version from Candelatech > / Kvalos repo? I'm biased, but I think CT firmware would be a better choice that 636, especially if you can run our CT kernel patches. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k