From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] PCI: ACPI: Setting up DMA coherency for PCI device from _CCA attribute Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:48:25 +0700 Message-ID: <55F0EF79.3090202@amd.com> References: <1440597279-11802-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <55F02331.2060001@amd.com> <8172790.rR5Ld4j83C@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bl2on0089.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.169.89]:52960 "EHLO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752766AbbIJCsg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:48:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8172790.rR5Ld4j83C@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Rafael, On 9/10/2015 3:38 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 07:16:49 PM Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote: >> >Hi All, >> > >> >Are there any other concerns about this patch series? > I have none, but then it sort of missed the merge window. > > I can easily queue it up for the next one unless it is super-urgent, > but in that case I need to know why that's the case. > This is not urgent. This mainly needed to enable the ACPI PCI supports for ARM64 which is still work in progress. Thanks, Suravee From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] PCI: ACPI: Setting up DMA coherency for PCI device from _CCA attribute To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1440597279-11802-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <55F02331.2060001@amd.com> <8172790.rR5Ld4j83C@vostro.rjw.lan> CC: , , , , , , , , From: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" Message-ID: <55F0EF79.3090202@amd.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:48:25 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8172790.rR5Ld4j83C@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Rafael, On 9/10/2015 3:38 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 07:16:49 PM Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote: >> >Hi All, >> > >> >Are there any other concerns about this patch series? > I have none, but then it sort of missed the merge window. > > I can easily queue it up for the next one unless it is super-urgent, > but in that case I need to know why that's the case. > This is not urgent. This mainly needed to enable the ACPI PCI supports for ARM64 which is still work in progress. Thanks, Suravee From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com (Suthikulpanit, Suravee) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:48:25 +0700 Subject: [PATCH V3 0/4] PCI: ACPI: Setting up DMA coherency for PCI device from _CCA attribute In-Reply-To: <8172790.rR5Ld4j83C@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1440597279-11802-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <55F02331.2060001@amd.com> <8172790.rR5Ld4j83C@vostro.rjw.lan> Message-ID: <55F0EF79.3090202@amd.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Rafael, On 9/10/2015 3:38 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 07:16:49 PM Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote: >> >Hi All, >> > >> >Are there any other concerns about this patch series? > I have none, but then it sort of missed the merge window. > > I can easily queue it up for the next one unless it is super-urgent, > but in that case I need to know why that's the case. > This is not urgent. This mainly needed to enable the ACPI PCI supports for ARM64 which is still work in progress. Thanks, Suravee