From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
"Ian.Campbell@citrix.com" <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: tools: any user of xc_dom_image->allocate?
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:25:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F2D666.1050309@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F281D5.2000609@suse.com>
On 11/09/15 08:25, Juergen Gross wrote:
> While testing xen tools patches to start a pv-domU >512GB I stumbled
> over a problem in the domain builder: it is keeping track of the last
> allocated virtual address in the memory image it is creating. For
> very huge domains (>1TB) this virtual address will wrap around as it is
> starting at -2GB and the p2m for such a domain is >2GB.
>
> With a modern pvops kernel (4.3) this would be no problem, as it is
> supporting mapping the p2m to an arbitrary address.
>
> In the domain builder, however, I can't currently just ignore the wrap,
> as after each memory allocation for the domain image dom->allocate() is
> being called with the last allocated virtual address as an argument.
> dom->allocate() is allowed to be NULL (in which case it isn't called).
>
> I have found no user of dom->allocate(), deleting it from the struct
> xc_dom_image and removing the call sites in xc_dom_core.c didn't break
> the build.
>
> Are there any objections to remove the allocate() function in struct
> xc_dom_image?
If there are no in-tree users, and no known out-of-tree users, good
riddance to it.
~Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-11 7:25 tools: any user of xc_dom_image->allocate? Juergen Gross
2015-09-11 13:25 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F2D666.1050309@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.