All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	robert.jarzmik-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Jett.Zhou" <jtzhou-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Yi Zhang <yizhang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v5 RESEND 3/5] i2c: pxa: Add support for pxa910/988 & new configuration features
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:58:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F65AF7.8090706@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150911190619.GB1516@katana>



On Saturday 12 September 2015 12:36 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:29:36AM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>> TWSI_ILCR & TWSI_IWCR registers are used to adjust clock rate
>> of standard & fast mode in pxa910/988; so this patch adds these two new
>> entries to "struct pxa_reg_layout" and "struct pxa_i2c".
>>
>> As discussed in the previous patch-series, the idea here is to add standard
>> DT properties for ilcr and iwcr configuration fields.
>> In case of Master ilcr is used for low/high time and in case of slave mode
>> of operation iwcr is used for setup/hold time.
>
> I need to rethink how to describe i2c bus timing parameters in DT in the
> next days. But this is planned for 4.4., promised.
>
> One thing I already wonder about this one...
>
>>   static const struct platform_device_id i2c_pxa_id_table[] = {
>>   	{ "pxa2xx-i2c",		REGS_PXA2XX },
>>   	{ "pxa3xx-pwri2c",	REGS_PXA3XX },
>>   	{ "ce4100-i2c",		REGS_CE4100 },
>> +	{ "pxa910-i2c",		REGS_PXA910 },
>>   	{ },
>
> You add a new platform_id...
>
>> @@ -1135,7 +1170,7 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm i2c_pxa_pio_algorithm = {
>>   static const struct of_device_id i2c_pxa_dt_ids[] = {
>>   	{ .compatible = "mrvl,pxa-i2c", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA2XX },
>>   	{ .compatible = "mrvl,pwri2c", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA3XX },
>> -	{ .compatible = "mrvl,mmp-twsi", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA2XX },
>> +	{ .compatible = "mrvl,mmp-twsi", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA910 },
>>   	{}
>
> ...but change the compatible binding instead of adding a new one?
>

Yes, because the offset for both REGS_PXA2XX and REGS_PXA910 are same,
and for REGS_PXA2XX we already have compatible entry "mrvl,pxa-i2c".
And the i2c binding documentation, which says,
for platforms using REGS_PXA2XX, they need to provide additional node
"mrvl,pxa-i2c". Which is confusing :)

Also, when I did git-blame on the driver file to see why "mmp-twsi"
entry has been added without anyone really using it. But I did not find
anything meaningful.
So, from the code it was very clear that, "mmp-twsi" and "pxa-i2c" both
are same, its the code which I am adding here brings difference between 
them.

I tried to find datasheet for the platforms using "mmp-twsi", but was
unlucky.


Thanks,
Vaibhav




Thanks,
Vaibhav

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH-v5 RESEND 3/5] i2c: pxa: Add support for pxa910/988 & new configuration features
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:58:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F65AF7.8090706@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150911190619.GB1516@katana>



On Saturday 12 September 2015 12:36 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:29:36AM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>> TWSI_ILCR & TWSI_IWCR registers are used to adjust clock rate
>> of standard & fast mode in pxa910/988; so this patch adds these two new
>> entries to "struct pxa_reg_layout" and "struct pxa_i2c".
>>
>> As discussed in the previous patch-series, the idea here is to add standard
>> DT properties for ilcr and iwcr configuration fields.
>> In case of Master ilcr is used for low/high time and in case of slave mode
>> of operation iwcr is used for setup/hold time.
>
> I need to rethink how to describe i2c bus timing parameters in DT in the
> next days. But this is planned for 4.4., promised.
>
> One thing I already wonder about this one...
>
>>   static const struct platform_device_id i2c_pxa_id_table[] = {
>>   	{ "pxa2xx-i2c",		REGS_PXA2XX },
>>   	{ "pxa3xx-pwri2c",	REGS_PXA3XX },
>>   	{ "ce4100-i2c",		REGS_CE4100 },
>> +	{ "pxa910-i2c",		REGS_PXA910 },
>>   	{ },
>
> You add a new platform_id...
>
>> @@ -1135,7 +1170,7 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm i2c_pxa_pio_algorithm = {
>>   static const struct of_device_id i2c_pxa_dt_ids[] = {
>>   	{ .compatible = "mrvl,pxa-i2c", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA2XX },
>>   	{ .compatible = "mrvl,pwri2c", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA3XX },
>> -	{ .compatible = "mrvl,mmp-twsi", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA2XX },
>> +	{ .compatible = "mrvl,mmp-twsi", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA910 },
>>   	{}
>
> ...but change the compatible binding instead of adding a new one?
>

Yes, because the offset for both REGS_PXA2XX and REGS_PXA910 are same,
and for REGS_PXA2XX we already have compatible entry "mrvl,pxa-i2c".
And the i2c binding documentation, which says,
for platforms using REGS_PXA2XX, they need to provide additional node
"mrvl,pxa-i2c". Which is confusing :)

Also, when I did git-blame on the driver file to see why "mmp-twsi"
entry has been added without anyone really using it. But I did not find
anything meaningful.
So, from the code it was very clear that, "mmp-twsi" and "pxa-i2c" both
are same, its the code which I am adding here brings difference between 
them.

I tried to find datasheet for the platforms using "mmp-twsi", but was
unlucky.


Thanks,
Vaibhav




Thanks,
Vaibhav

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	robert.jarzmik@free.fr, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jett.Zhou" <jtzhou@marvell.com>, Yi Zhang <yizhang@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v5 RESEND 3/5] i2c: pxa: Add support for pxa910/988 & new configuration features
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:58:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F65AF7.8090706@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150911190619.GB1516@katana>



On Saturday 12 September 2015 12:36 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:29:36AM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>> TWSI_ILCR & TWSI_IWCR registers are used to adjust clock rate
>> of standard & fast mode in pxa910/988; so this patch adds these two new
>> entries to "struct pxa_reg_layout" and "struct pxa_i2c".
>>
>> As discussed in the previous patch-series, the idea here is to add standard
>> DT properties for ilcr and iwcr configuration fields.
>> In case of Master ilcr is used for low/high time and in case of slave mode
>> of operation iwcr is used for setup/hold time.
>
> I need to rethink how to describe i2c bus timing parameters in DT in the
> next days. But this is planned for 4.4., promised.
>
> One thing I already wonder about this one...
>
>>   static const struct platform_device_id i2c_pxa_id_table[] = {
>>   	{ "pxa2xx-i2c",		REGS_PXA2XX },
>>   	{ "pxa3xx-pwri2c",	REGS_PXA3XX },
>>   	{ "ce4100-i2c",		REGS_CE4100 },
>> +	{ "pxa910-i2c",		REGS_PXA910 },
>>   	{ },
>
> You add a new platform_id...
>
>> @@ -1135,7 +1170,7 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm i2c_pxa_pio_algorithm = {
>>   static const struct of_device_id i2c_pxa_dt_ids[] = {
>>   	{ .compatible = "mrvl,pxa-i2c", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA2XX },
>>   	{ .compatible = "mrvl,pwri2c", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA3XX },
>> -	{ .compatible = "mrvl,mmp-twsi", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA2XX },
>> +	{ .compatible = "mrvl,mmp-twsi", .data = (void *)REGS_PXA910 },
>>   	{}
>
> ...but change the compatible binding instead of adding a new one?
>

Yes, because the offset for both REGS_PXA2XX and REGS_PXA910 are same,
and for REGS_PXA2XX we already have compatible entry "mrvl,pxa-i2c".
And the i2c binding documentation, which says,
for platforms using REGS_PXA2XX, they need to provide additional node
"mrvl,pxa-i2c". Which is confusing :)

Also, when I did git-blame on the driver file to see why "mmp-twsi"
entry has been added without anyone really using it. But I did not find
anything meaningful.
So, from the code it was very clear that, "mmp-twsi" and "pxa-i2c" both
are same, its the code which I am adding here brings difference between 
them.

I tried to find datasheet for the platforms using "mmp-twsi", but was
unlucky.


Thanks,
Vaibhav




Thanks,
Vaibhav

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-14  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-24  5:59 [PATCH-v5 RESEND 0/5] i2c: pxa: Add support for PXA910 family of device Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-24  5:59 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-24  5:59 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-24  5:59 ` [PATCH-v5 RESEND 1/5] Documentation: binding: add new property 'disable_after_xfer' to i2c-pxa Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-24  5:59   ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-24  5:59 ` [PATCH-v5 RESEND 2/5] i2c: pxa: enable/disable i2c module across msg xfer Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-24  5:59   ` Vaibhav Hiremath
     [not found]   ` <1440395978-9065-3-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-11 18:53     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-09-11 18:53       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-09-11 18:53       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-09-14  5:07       ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14  5:07         ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-10-25  8:21         ` Wolfram Sang
2015-10-25  8:21           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-24  5:59 ` [PATCH-v5 RESEND 3/5] i2c: pxa: Add support for pxa910/988 & new configuration features Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-24  5:59   ` Vaibhav Hiremath
     [not found]   ` <1440395978-9065-4-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-11 19:06     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-09-11 19:06       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-09-11 19:06       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-09-14  5:28       ` Vaibhav Hiremath [this message]
2015-09-14  5:28         ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14  5:28         ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-10-25  8:40         ` Wolfram Sang
2015-10-25  8:40           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-10-25  8:25   ` Wolfram Sang
2015-10-25  8:25     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-24  5:59 ` [PATCH-v5 RESEND 4/5] Documentation: binding: add sclk adjustment properties to i2c-pxa Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-24  5:59   ` Vaibhav Hiremath
     [not found]   ` <1440395978-9065-5-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-25  8:37     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-10-25  8:37       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-10-25  8:37       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-24  5:59 ` [PATCH-v5 RESEND 5/5] i2c: pxa: Add ILCR (tLow & tHigh) configuration support Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-24  5:59   ` Vaibhav Hiremath
     [not found] ` <1440395978-9065-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-02  6:47   ` [PATCH-v5 RESEND 0/5] i2c: pxa: Add support for PXA910 family of device Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-02  6:47     ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-02  6:47     ` Vaibhav Hiremath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F65AF7.8090706@linaro.org \
    --to=vaibhav.hiremath-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jtzhou-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=yizhang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.