All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ is still 0x00040600 in staging
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:19:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F6BB67.2070201@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F6D5F102000078000A2911@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 09/14/2015 03:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 14.09.15 at 13:53, <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com> wrote:
>> I've found this out by accident, since I have some code that does some
>> #ifdef tricks based on __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__, but while
>> running staging ("Xen version 4.7-unstable") it seems that in
>> xen/xen-compat.h we still have:
>>
>> #define __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ 0x00040600
>>
>> Is this intended?
> 
> Was there any incompatible interface change already that would
> have required bumping the value?

None, at least as far as my code is concerned. It's just that I've
already added a new libxc helper function with assorted HV-side code and
just assumed that __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ had been bumped to
0x00040700, so some of my own code wasn't being compiled as it depended
on that value. Of course, there's nothing wrong with the current
approach, I was just curious if bumps happen as soon as a new version is
out or only when the interface changes.


Thanks,
Razvan

      reply	other threads:[~2015-09-14 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-14 11:53 __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ is still 0x00040600 in staging Razvan Cojocaru
2015-09-14 12:13 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-14 12:19   ` Razvan Cojocaru [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F6BB67.2070201@bitdefender.com \
    --to=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.