From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] efi/libstub/fdt: Standardize the names of EFI stub parameters Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 05:34:35 -0600 Message-ID: <55F6CCEB02000078000A28CC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> References: <20150910112418.GC29293@leverpostej> <20150910121514.GE29293@leverpostej> <20150910144938.GI29293@leverpostej> <20150910162302.GN29293@leverpostej> <20150911124643.GB4530@olila.local.net-space.pl> <20150911154534.GD4530@olila.local.net-space.pl> <55F6886D.1090900@huawei.com> <55F693F5.8030203@huawei.com> <55F6C01502000078000A2823@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Mark Rutland , "Ian.Campbell-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "julien.grall-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , Stefano Stabellini , Shannon Zhao , "leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "shannon.zhao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "xen-devel-GuqFBffKawuEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org" , Daniel Kiper , "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org >>> On 14.09.15 at 13:16, wrote: > (I still think not using SetVirtualAddressMap() at all > would be the best approach for arm64, but unfortunately, most of my > colleagues disagree with me) Any reasons they have? I'm curious because we run x86 Xen without using this function ... Jan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: JBeulich@suse.com (Jan Beulich) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 05:34:35 -0600 Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] efi/libstub/fdt: Standardize the names of EFI stub parameters In-Reply-To: References: <20150910112418.GC29293@leverpostej> <20150910121514.GE29293@leverpostej> <20150910144938.GI29293@leverpostej> <20150910162302.GN29293@leverpostej> <20150911124643.GB4530@olila.local.net-space.pl> <20150911154534.GD4530@olila.local.net-space.pl> <55F6886D.1090900@huawei.com> <55F693F5.8030203@huawei.com> <55F6C01502000078000A2823@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Message-ID: <55F6CCEB02000078000A28CC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org >>> On 14.09.15 at 13:16, wrote: > (I still think not using SetVirtualAddressMap() at all > would be the best approach for arm64, but unfortunately, most of my > colleagues disagree with me) Any reasons they have? I'm curious because we run x86 Xen without using this function ... Jan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755492AbbINLel (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 07:34:41 -0400 Received: from prv-mh.provo.novell.com ([137.65.248.74]:57951 "EHLO prv-mh.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754097AbbINLek convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 07:34:40 -0400 Message-Id: <55F6CCEB02000078000A28CC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 14.0.1 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 05:34:35 -0600 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Ard Biesheuvel" Cc: "Mark Rutland" , "Ian.Campbell@citrix.com" , "julien.grall@citrix.com" , "Stefano Stabellini" , "Shannon Zhao" , "leif.lindholm@linaro.org" , "shannon.zhao@linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , "Daniel Kiper" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] efi/libstub/fdt: Standardize the names of EFI stub parameters References: <20150910112418.GC29293@leverpostej> <20150910121514.GE29293@leverpostej> <20150910144938.GI29293@leverpostej> <20150910162302.GN29293@leverpostej> <20150911124643.GB4530@olila.local.net-space.pl> <20150911154534.GD4530@olila.local.net-space.pl> <55F6886D.1090900@huawei.com> <55F693F5.8030203@huawei.com> <55F6C01502000078000A2823@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 14.09.15 at 13:16, wrote: > (I still think not using SetVirtualAddressMap() at all > would be the best approach for arm64, but unfortunately, most of my > colleagues disagree with me) Any reasons they have? I'm curious because we run x86 Xen without using this function ... Jan