From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: radosgw socket dir Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:00:21 +0200 Message-ID: <55F6EF15.1090501@42on.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp02.mail.pcextreme.nl ([109.72.87.139]:55292 "EHLO smtp02.mail.pcextreme.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752068AbbINQAZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil , osynge@suse.com Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 14-09-15 17:05, Sage Weil wrote: > radosgw now runs as ceph:ceph under systemd. /run/ceph-rgw is 755 owned > as the web user. I think this will break anybody using apache and > fastcgi. That's not the default, but I don't think that combo > makes any sense anyway. > > Should we... > > - make /run/ceph-rgw ceph:ceph 0755, make the sockets 770, and then make > the user add the web user to the ceph group? > > - make /run/ceph-rgw ceph:www 0755 + group sticky bit and then make the > sockets 770 so that the web user can open them? > > - get rid of /run/ceph-rgw entirely and let the admin do this on their > own if they want to do fastcgi instead of civetweb? > > I like of like the last option... I agree. I would not promote FastCGI in any way. Civetweb is easier and faster. So if anyone wants FastCGI, let them override the systemd service file and add the socket. > sage > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >