From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: shec tests failure on i386 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:01:41 +0200 Message-ID: <55F727A5.1080300@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X8KB8r7GIDMJdja5gco0nWC2SNjSfXtss" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:55287 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751339AbbINUBn (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:01:43 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Miyamae, Takeshi" Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --X8KB8r7GIDMJdja5gco0nWC2SNjSfXtss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Takeshi, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12936 shows that shec tests fail on i386. = Before I investigate further, I'd like to know if you had a chance to run= more tests ? There are not many users of i386 these days, of course ;-) = But this is a good test to verify there are no architecture related probl= ems. Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --X8KB8r7GIDMJdja5gco0nWC2SNjSfXtss Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlX3J6UACgkQ8dLMyEl6F233nwCdHId35DWYU48YoSoTVjE5CNgj +qAAoI1cfZTy0GnhkonHgDIWH4NYDBxp =cLUo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X8KB8r7GIDMJdja5gco0nWC2SNjSfXtss--