From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Backporting from Infernalis and c++11 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:21:47 +0200 Message-ID: <55F7C70B.4000308@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l7vOdwE4phE0oBQNxi2hd4cdI07JnaXK7" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:55528 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750698AbbIOHVt (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:21:49 -0400 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (unknown [10.0.2.28]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87FC42130 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:21:47 +0200 (CEST) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --l7vOdwE4phE0oBQNxi2hd4cdI07JnaXK7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ceph, With Infernalis Ceph move to c++11 (and CMake), we will see more conflict= s when backporting bug fixes to Hammer. Any ideas you may have to better = deal with this would be most welcome. Since these conflicts will be mostl= y cosmetic, they should not be too difficult to resolve. The trick will b= e for someone not familiar with the codebase to separate what is cosmetic= and what is not. This does not happen yet, no immediate concern :-) Maybe if we think abou= t that well in advance we'll be in a better position to deal with it late= r on ? Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --l7vOdwE4phE0oBQNxi2hd4cdI07JnaXK7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlX3xwsACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22FBQCguaZZ0rpWMD83oCTCveYNCfw3 6soAn2pISz/Yh48NoPqxhVv8ojIzsyyS =ToAl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l7vOdwE4phE0oBQNxi2hd4cdI07JnaXK7--