From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Backporting from Infernalis and c++11 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:19:15 +0200 Message-ID: <55F7F0A3.9090203@dachary.org> References: <55F7C70B.4000308@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MkrWEUgOTdm5ilnxnLk4RAbjqwGSmRQXa" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:55638 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751601AbbIOKTS (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 06:19:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: John Spray Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --MkrWEUgOTdm5ilnxnLk4RAbjqwGSmRQXa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi John, On 15/09/2015 12:02, John Spray wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:= >> With Infernalis Ceph move to c++11 (and CMake), we will see more confl= icts when backporting bug fixes to Hammer. Any ideas you may have to bett= er deal with this would be most welcome. Since these conflicts will be mo= stly cosmetic, they should not be too difficult to resolve. The trick wil= l be for someone not familiar with the codebase to separate what is cosme= tic and what is not. >> >> This does not happen yet, no immediate concern :-) Maybe if we think a= bout that well in advance we'll be in a better position to deal with it l= ater on ? >=20 > I think this came up in conversation but wasn't necessarily made > official policy yet -- my understanding is that we are (already) > endeavouring to avoid c++11isms in bug fixes, along with the usual > principle of fixing bugs in the smallest/neatest patch we can. >=20 > Perhaps in cases where those of us working on master mistakenly put > something un-backportable in a bug fix, it would be reasonable for the > backporter to point it out and poke us for a clean version of the > patch. We'll do our best but it's very reassuring to know we can rely on you if = we struggle with c++11isms :-) Thanks ! --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --MkrWEUgOTdm5ilnxnLk4RAbjqwGSmRQXa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlX38KMACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20rTwCeMUdYeuBt+eTxsff+jK/HzJei rvYAoLSNwQhP6cArIF4pYNLd2A35/ulX =juE/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MkrWEUgOTdm5ilnxnLk4RAbjqwGSmRQXa--