All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <55F82252.4090900@samsung.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index e65cc97..b0f4c53 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 On 09/15/2015 03:31 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
 > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
 >
->>>>  v at p
+>>>>  v@p
 >>>> (
 >>>> *< 0
 >>>> |
@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@ On 09/15/2015 03:31 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
 >> Will the following SmPL approach be more appropriate then?
 >>
 >> (
->> *v at p < 0
+>> *v@p < 0
 >> |
->> *v at p <= 0
+>> *v@p <= 0
 >> )
 > Actually, all of
 >
 > v < 0 (never true)
-> v <= 0 (same as v == 0)
+> v <= 0 (same as v = 0)
 > v >= 0 (always true)
 >
 > would seem to merit attention.  Andrzej, what do you think?
@@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ Andrzej
 >> Markus
 >> --
 >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
->> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
+>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
 >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 >>
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 94b8ba3..8533944 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,16 +3,16 @@
  "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1509151505240.2537@hadrien\0"
  "ref\055F81A31.3040808@users.sourceforge.net\0"
  "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1509151530190.2537@hadrien\0"
- "From\0a.hajda@samsung.com (Andrzej Hajda)\0"
- "Subject\0[Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero\0"
- "Date\0Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:51:14 +0200\0"
+ "From\0Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero\0"
+ "Date\0Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:51:14 +0000\0"
  "To\0cocci@systeme.lip6.fr\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 09/15/2015 03:31 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:\n"
  "> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:\n"
  ">\n"
- ">>>>  v at p\n"
+ ">>>>  v@p\n"
  ">>>> (\n"
  ">>>> *< 0\n"
  ">>>> |\n"
@@ -23,14 +23,14 @@
  ">> Will the following SmPL approach be more appropriate then?\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> (\n"
- ">> *v at p < 0\n"
+ ">> *v@p < 0\n"
  ">> |\n"
- ">> *v at p <= 0\n"
+ ">> *v@p <= 0\n"
  ">> )\n"
  "> Actually, all of\n"
  ">\n"
  "> v < 0 (never true)\n"
- "> v <= 0 (same as v == 0)\n"
+ "> v <= 0 (same as v = 0)\n"
  "> v >= 0 (always true)\n"
  ">\n"
  "> would seem to merit attention.  Andrzej, what do you think?\n"
@@ -50,8 +50,8 @@
  ">> Markus\n"
  ">> --\n"
  ">> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe kernel-janitors\" in\n"
- ">> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
+ ">> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n"
  ">> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html\n"
  >>
 
-225e1486affd4b366b4c8c520ea835d11f2c0fbf4837a7c2a1c7974261b6fc31
+82f89fec23cbd711f9ddb00d8b45b6bc7fc0b71333f8e2f2d7b22d27b64924c9

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index e65cc97..6d2a66a 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 On 09/15/2015 03:31 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
 > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
 >
->>>>  v at p
+>>>>  v@p
 >>>> (
 >>>> *< 0
 >>>> |
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ On 09/15/2015 03:31 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
 >> Will the following SmPL approach be more appropriate then?
 >>
 >> (
->> *v at p < 0
+>> *v@p < 0
 >> |
->> *v at p <= 0
+>> *v@p <= 0
 >> )
 > Actually, all of
 >
@@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ Andrzej
 >> Markus
 >> --
 >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
->> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
+>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
 >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 >>
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 94b8ba3..d62fd0d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -3,16 +3,25 @@
  "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1509151505240.2537@hadrien\0"
  "ref\055F81A31.3040808@users.sourceforge.net\0"
  "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1509151530190.2537@hadrien\0"
- "From\0a.hajda@samsung.com (Andrzej Hajda)\0"
- "Subject\0[Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero\0"
+ "From\0Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:51:14 +0200\0"
- "To\0cocci@systeme.lip6.fr\0"
+ "To\0Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>"
+ " SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>\0"
+ "Cc\0Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>"
+  Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>
+  Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
+  Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
+  Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
+ " cocci@systeme.lip6.fr\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 09/15/2015 03:31 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:\n"
  "> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:\n"
  ">\n"
- ">>>>  v at p\n"
+ ">>>>  v@p\n"
  ">>>> (\n"
  ">>>> *< 0\n"
  ">>>> |\n"
@@ -23,9 +32,9 @@
  ">> Will the following SmPL approach be more appropriate then?\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> (\n"
- ">> *v at p < 0\n"
+ ">> *v@p < 0\n"
  ">> |\n"
- ">> *v at p <= 0\n"
+ ">> *v@p <= 0\n"
  ">> )\n"
  "> Actually, all of\n"
  ">\n"
@@ -50,8 +59,8 @@
  ">> Markus\n"
  ">> --\n"
  ">> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe kernel-janitors\" in\n"
- ">> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
+ ">> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n"
  ">> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html\n"
  >>
 
-225e1486affd4b366b4c8c520ea835d11f2c0fbf4837a7c2a1c7974261b6fc31
+395fa121a4181fb32fbc96f14910cc327087e367c5cd4ef2e8c256d79800450d

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.