From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4447CE00CF0; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:53:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.213.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3D2E00B51 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igcpb10 with SMTP id pb10so16075857igc.1 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:53:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ykf7AEh78zhV+N6eDscFlw6orDiL2I6yNDjXNaAMhUs=; b=JbQQc1I49haMaO1d9v3Sh6yBM4MuPMHrNzyQCjYvI0tXv3fqHUMfYxDfxRkZ2ltz9Y vHvXnjJE7NP6jNkwfLXlFB4u31RRw1UZGjBwBitpnUtQXocbxkfysC1oWnb2f0we3CG/ F87MXWnW/huc2T7oMRZ+4uifmf9oDGqp3jqzZCkpUOAzQ+nNGrXLwEvtN5CYSuHDHTO6 IEbDNKuNroFG2Ui+we0lm9xMq38c5JwYuTsxgQS9g4Jp+8PiOR1tk2ZrCtXpPnOhBYIF ZpTnW7dmyQ5qVUm9XXdzcPhCwmpTj55wRUnpasxZsz/cwOU7OTnbXrRMCzECf+9aW1iP G9uw== X-Received: by 10.50.124.4 with SMTP id me4mr6764029igb.34.1442328811454; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ro10sm7742125igb.1.2015.09.15.07.53.26 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:53:30 -0700 (PDT) To: "Paul D. DeRocco" , yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <55F82F8A.0@gmail.com> From: Trevor Woerner Message-ID: <55F830DF.5030804@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:53:19 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55F82F8A.0@gmail.com> Subject: Re: I hate busybox! X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:53:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/15/15 10:47, Trevor Woerner wrote: > The only place busybox (and > toybox) are needed today are in the MMU-less-type systems, such as > Cortex-Ms etc. Actually, the presence or lack of MMU is irrelevant, I meant to single out those systems with limited on-SoC flash.