From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 25150E00D10; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:36:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [74.55.86.74 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06099E00BD0 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:36:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-73-194-208-34.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [73.194.208.34]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FE52078E27; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:36:26 +0000 (UTC) To: Otavio Salvador References: <1439374948-918-1-git-send-email-zhenhua.luo@freescale.com> <1439374948-918-8-git-send-email-zhenhua.luo@freescale.com> <55F85460.5020107@mindchasers.com> From: Bob Cochran Message-ID: <55F88F56.7030303@mindchasers.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:36:22 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] linux-qoriq: unify recipe for QorIQ ARM and QorIQ PPC X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:36:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/15/2015 01:29 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: >> On 08/12/2015 06:22 AM, Zhenhua Luo wrote: >>> >>> * update linux-qoriq recipe to support both QorIQ ARM and QorIQ PPC >>> * update PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/linux for ls1 target >>> * remove linux-ls1 recipes >> >> >> Was this patch accepted, and if so, where did it go? >> >> Is this for the meta-freescale layer on git.freescale.com? If so, can't we >> get the meta-freescale layer moved to git.yoctoproject.org and set up a >> master branch? > > Yes, please check meta-freescale[1] for the ongoing effort. > > 1. https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale > Thanks, but I'm still confused. Based on Lauren Post's email from 6/29 with the subject: "Freescale meta-freescale announcement of new layer", I thought meta-freescale was going to be hosted this year at http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/yocto/meta-freescale.git/ Is this still going to be used? Someone please explain the purpose for these two repos with the same name. So we have 4 repos for QorIQ: i) meta-freescale on github; meta-freescale on freescale.com; iii) meta-fsl-ppc on yoctoproject.org; iv) meta-fsl-arm on yoctoproject.org. What happens now to meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc? Are these dead for new QorIQ / Layerscape development? And is there a mailing list to see when patches get applied to the meta-freescale repo on gitub.com/Freescale, or are you just expecting us to watch it via github? You have always done such a great job letting us know when patches are applied to meta-fsl-arm. BTW, the linux-qoriq kernel built with ls1021a_defconfig also failed to build in the same way as it did when being built with the linux-ls1 recipe in meta-fsl-arm. At this point, I'm guessing there is a tools issue, since I can build the same commit with the SDK1.8 (stable) toolchain and config. I'll dig a little deeper, but please let me know if this is a known issue. | /build/yocto/ls1020/tmp/work-shared/ls1021atwr/kernel-source/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c:66:7: error: redefinition of 'return_address' | void *return_address(unsigned int level) | ^ Bob