From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 8E3F3E00D12; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:56:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [74.55.86.74 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BEBE00B5C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-73-194-208-34.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [73.194.208.34]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE90207A32F; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:56:26 +0000 (UTC) To: Otavio Salvador References: <1439374948-918-1-git-send-email-zhenhua.luo@freescale.com> <1439374948-918-8-git-send-email-zhenhua.luo@freescale.com> <55F85460.5020107@mindchasers.com> <55F88F56.7030303@mindchasers.com> From: Bob Cochran Message-ID: <55F8A215.9080205@mindchasers.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:56:21 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] linux-qoriq: unify recipe for QorIQ ARM and QorIQ PPC X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:56:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/15/2015 05:50 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Bob, > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: >> On 09/15/2015 01:29 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Bob Cochran >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 08/12/2015 06:22 AM, Zhenhua Luo wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * update linux-qoriq recipe to support both QorIQ ARM and QorIQ PPC >>>>> * update PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/linux for ls1 target >>>>> * remove linux-ls1 recipes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Was this patch accepted, and if so, where did it go? >>>> >>>> Is this for the meta-freescale layer on git.freescale.com? If so, can't >>>> we >>>> get the meta-freescale layer moved to git.yoctoproject.org and set up a >>>> master branch? >>> >>> >>> Yes, please check meta-freescale[1] for the ongoing effort. >>> >>> 1. https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale >>> >> >> Thanks, but I'm still confused. >> >> Based on Lauren Post's email from 6/29 with the subject: "Freescale >> meta-freescale announcement of new layer", I thought meta-freescale was >> going to be hosted this year at >> >> http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/yocto/meta-freescale.git/ >> >> Is this still going to be used? Someone please explain the purpose for >> these two repos with the same name. > > Yes; this will host the releases done until upstreamed. > >> So we have 4 repos for QorIQ: i) meta-freescale on github; meta-freescale on >> freescale.com; iii) meta-fsl-ppc on yoctoproject.org; iv) meta-fsl-arm on >> yoctoproject.org. >> >> What happens now to meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc? Are these dead for new >> QorIQ / Layerscape development? > > Once the transition is done for meta-freescale, community development > will focus on meta-freescale but as this is still not clear when all > merge will be complete and stable I've been keeping meta-fsl-arm > update and is my main test platform. Thanks for all the info Otavio. I'm assuming your attention to meta-fsl-arm is primarily for i.MX. Please let me know if you are also testing LS1 (e.g., ls1021a-twr) now using meta-fsl-arm. And I still need to figure out which repo(s) I should use to most effectively develop & test with the changes coming for Yocto 1.9. I think I want to work with the github meta-freescale repo, especially since I need to build images for both ARM and Power. Please let me know if you disagree and think I'm just asking for headaches due to a lack of stability. Asking another way, are people testing against the github meta-freescale repo / layer? > >> And is there a mailing list to see when patches get applied to the >> meta-freescale repo on gitub.com/Freescale, or are you just expecting us to >> watch it via github? You have always done such a great job letting us know >> when patches are applied to meta-fsl-arm. > > I have not been sending meta-freescale merges here to avoid flooding > it. It is still not ready for production use and then I assumed people > wishing to participate would follow the repository. I can start > sending it though... > >> BTW, the linux-qoriq kernel built with ls1021a_defconfig also failed to >> build in the same way as it did when being built with the linux-ls1 recipe >> in meta-fsl-arm. At this point, I'm guessing there is a tools issue, since >> I can build the same commit with the SDK1.8 (stable) toolchain and config. >> I'll dig a little deeper, but please let me know if this is a known issue. >> >> | >> /build/yocto/ls1020/tmp/work-shared/ls1021atwr/kernel-source/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c:66:7: >> error: redefinition of 'return_address' >> | void *return_address(unsigned int level) >> | ^ > > GCC 5.2 gift! ;-) >