From: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao@suse.de>
To: Somnath Roy <Somnath.Roy@sandisk.com>,
Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com>
Cc: ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Very slow recovery/peering with latest master
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:59:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F9F444.8060805@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <755F6B91B3BE364F9BCA11EA3F9E0C6F2CE49E1A@SACMBXIP01.sdcorp.global.sandisk.com>
On 09/16/2015 10:19 PM, Somnath Roy wrote:
>
> Sage/Greg,
>
> Yeah, as we expected, it is not happening probably because of recovery settings. I reverted it back in my ceph.conf , but, still seeing this problem.
>
> Some observation :
> ----------------------
>
> 1. First of all, I don't think it is something related to my environment. I recreated the cluster with Hammer and this problem is not there.
>
> 2. I have enabled the messenger/monclient log (Couldn't attach here) in one of the OSDs and found monitor is taking long time to detect the up OSDs. If you see the log, I have started OSD at 2015-09-16 16:13:07.042463 , but, there is no communication (only getting KEEP_ALIVE) till 2015-09-16 16:16:07.180482 , so, 3 mins !!
>
> 3. During this period, I saw monclient trying to communicate with monitor but not able to probably. It is sending osd_boot at 2015-09-16 16:16:07.180482 only..
>
> 2015-09-16 16:16:07.180450 7f65377fe700 10 monclient: _send_mon_message to mon.a at 10.60.194.10:6789/0
> 2015-09-16 16:16:07.180482 7f65377fe700 1 -- 10.60.194.10:6820/20102 --> 10.60.194.10:6789/0 -- osd_boot(osd.10 booted 0 features 72057594037927935 v45) v6 -- ?+0 0x7f6523c19100 con 0x7f6542045680
> 2015-09-16 16:16:07.180496 7f65377fe700 20 -- 10.60.194.10:6820/20102 submit_message osd_boot(osd.10 booted 0 features 72057594037927935 v45) v6 remote, 10.60.194.10:6789/0, have pipe.
Is this the only monitor in your cluster? Are there others?
Logs would certainly be helpful. The more the merrier, I'd think.
If you can't send them to the list, please find some place where we can
reach them, or drop them in cephdrop and point us to them.
Thanks!
-Joao
> 4. BTW, the osd down scenario is detected very quickly (ceph -w output) , problem is during coming up I guess.
>
>
> So, something related to mon communication getting slower ?
> Let me know if more verbose logging is required and how should I share the log..
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Somnath
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:gfarnum@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:35 AM
> To: Somnath Roy
> Cc: ceph-devel
> Subject: Re: Very slow recovery/peering with latest master
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Somnath Roy <Somnath.Roy@sandisk.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am seeing very slow recovery when I am adding OSDs with the latest master.
>> Also, If I just restart all the OSDs (no IO is going on in the cluster) , cluster is taking a significant amount of time to reach in active+clean state (and even detecting all the up OSDs).
>>
>> I saw the recovery/backfill default parameters are now changed (to lower value) , this probably explains the recovery scenario , but, will it affect the peering time during OSD startup as well ?
>
> I don't think these values should impact peering time, but you could configure them back to the old defaults and see if it changes.
> -Greg
>
> ________________________________
>
> PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or electronically stored copies).
>
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�]z���{ay�\x1dʇڙ�,j\a��f���h���z�\x1e�w���\f���j:+v���w�j�m����\a����zZ+�����ݢj"��!tml=
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-16 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-16 3:04 Very slow recovery/peering with latest master Somnath Roy
2015-09-16 18:35 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-09-16 21:19 ` Somnath Roy
2015-09-16 22:59 ` Joao Eduardo Luis [this message]
2015-09-23 22:48 ` Somnath Roy
2015-09-23 23:06 ` Samuel Just
2015-09-23 23:18 ` Somnath Roy
2015-09-23 23:19 ` Handzik, Joe
2015-09-23 23:26 ` Somnath Roy
2015-09-23 23:42 ` Handzik, Joe
2015-09-24 1:31 ` Sage Weil
2015-09-24 6:32 ` Podoski, Igor
2015-09-24 16:09 ` Somnath Roy
2015-09-28 8:01 ` Chen, Xiaoxi
2015-09-28 8:42 ` Somnath Roy
2015-09-28 12:21 ` Handzik, Joe
2015-09-24 18:27 ` Gregory Farnum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F9F444.8060805@suse.de \
--to=joao@suse.de \
--cc=Somnath.Roy@sandisk.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gfarnum@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.