From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:57:19 +0200 Message-ID: <55FBB5CF.30206@dachary.org> References: <870DE8DBB716524BAE51B2D499EC81E40AB98467@g01jpexmbyt24> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vEJkvx0OmvxxsjblR0Iwt2SFWNSFfFJgo" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:57377 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751478AbbIRG50 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 02:57:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Robert LeBlanc Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vEJkvx0OmvxxsjblR0Iwt2SFWNSFfFJgo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Robert, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10399 was backported to hammer and will be= in v0.94.4 (see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12751 for details). Cheers On 18/09/2015 02:44, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > Can we get http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10399 into hammer. We hit thi= s today. > ---------------- > Robert LeBlanc > PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 >=20 >=20 > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote: >> Hi Loic, >=20 >> As the last pull request #5257 was committed into the main trunk, >> we believe all the SHEC codes in main trunk are ready to be backported= into Hammer branch. >> What can we do at this moment? >=20 >> Best regards, >> Takeshi Miyamae >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Miyamae, Takeshi/=E5=AE=AE=E5=89=8D =E5=89=9B >> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 4:09 PM >> To: 'ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org' >> Cc: Paul Von-Stamwitz (PVonStamwitz@us.fujitsu.com); Toshine, Naoyoshi= /=E5=88=A9=E6=A0=B9 =E7=9B=B4=E4=BD=B3; Shiozawa, Kensuke/=E5=A1=A9=E6=B2= =A2 =E8=B3=A2=E8=BC=94; Nakao, Takanori/=E4=B8=AD=E5=B0=BE =E9=B7=B9=E8=A9= =94 (nakao.takanori@jp.fujitsu.com) >> Subject: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? >=20 >> Dear Loic, >=20 >> We would like to let following two patches be backported to hammer v0.= 94.4. >> (And our wish is finally backporting these patches to RHCS v1.3.) Can = it be possible? If possible, please let us know what should be started at= first. >> (Caution: #5257 has not been committed to master branch yet.) >=20 >> erasure-code: shec plugin feature #5493 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5493 >=20 >> erasure code: shec performance optimization by decoding cache #5257 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5257 >=20 >> Best regards, >> Takeshi Miyamae >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Loic Dachary dachary.org> >> Subject: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? >> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel >> Date: 2015-09-02 11:00:53 GMT (15 hours and 32 minutes ago) Hi, >=20 >> I added a link to >=20 >> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO#Overview-of-= the-backports-in-progress >=20 >> to show all issues that should be in the next point release for >=20 >> hammer v0.94.4 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/495 >> firefly v0.80.11 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/480 >=20 >> Cheers >=20 >> -- >> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >=20 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --vEJkvx0OmvxxsjblR0Iwt2SFWNSFfFJgo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlX7tc8ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21fwgCeMvyMgUR7QyK+oJdGeRm3VSp7 eU8An068TdQa6lFmUjMhSY6tw2aNg+r8 =9zF0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vEJkvx0OmvxxsjblR0Iwt2SFWNSFfFJgo--