From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] ST PLL fixes for 4.3-rc2 To: Stephen Boyd References: <1442389379-9298-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org> <20150916223051.GO23081@codeaurora.org> <55FA8C14.3020000@st.com> <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org> CC: Gabriel Fernandez , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Srinivas Kandagatla , Patrice Chotard , Russell King , Michael Turquette , Peter Griffin , Pankaj Dev , Olivier Bideau , Geert Uytterhoeven , Fabian Frederick , , , , , From: Maxime Coquelin Message-ID: <55FBBDCE.8070905@st.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:31:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/17/2015 08:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/17, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> >> On 09/17/2015 12:30 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 09/16, Gabriel Fernandez wrote: >>>> This patch set fixes a kernel crash : >>> [..] >>>> This kernel crash is due to a broken compatibility with this commit: >>>> commit 5eb26c605909 ("ARM: STi: DT: Rename st_pll3200c32_407_c0_x into st_pll3200c32_cx_x") >>> It isn't clear who's supposed to apply this because the To: list >>> is huge. Did you want to take this through arm-soc? If so, feel >>> free to take my acked-by on the second patch. The first patch >>> doesn't even apply to clk tree because the patch introducing the >>> typo didn't go through our tree. >> Indeed Stephen, I see it went through my tree (STi DT). >> So the first patch should be taken through arm-soc. >> The second patch, should be taken through yours I think. >> > Ok. That probably breaks bisectability, but if you're not > worried, I'm not worried. I'm not worried about bisectability indeed, as the first patch is just typo fixes in DT Bindings documentation. Regards, Maxime From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.coquelin@st.com (Maxime Coquelin) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:31:26 +0200 Subject: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] ST PLL fixes for 4.3-rc2 In-Reply-To: <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org> References: <1442389379-9298-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org> <20150916223051.GO23081@codeaurora.org> <55FA8C14.3020000@st.com> <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <55FBBDCE.8070905@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/17/2015 08:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/17, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> >> On 09/17/2015 12:30 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 09/16, Gabriel Fernandez wrote: >>>> This patch set fixes a kernel crash : >>> [..] >>>> This kernel crash is due to a broken compatibility with this commit: >>>> commit 5eb26c605909 ("ARM: STi: DT: Rename st_pll3200c32_407_c0_x into st_pll3200c32_cx_x") >>> It isn't clear who's supposed to apply this because the To: list >>> is huge. Did you want to take this through arm-soc? If so, feel >>> free to take my acked-by on the second patch. The first patch >>> doesn't even apply to clk tree because the patch introducing the >>> typo didn't go through our tree. >> Indeed Stephen, I see it went through my tree (STi DT). >> So the first patch should be taken through arm-soc. >> The second patch, should be taken through yours I think. >> > Ok. That probably breaks bisectability, but if you're not > worried, I'm not worried. I'm not worried about bisectability indeed, as the first patch is just typo fixes in DT Bindings documentation. Regards, Maxime From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] ST PLL fixes for 4.3-rc2 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:31:26 +0200 Message-ID: <55FBBDCE.8070905@st.com> References: <1442389379-9298-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org> <20150916223051.GO23081@codeaurora.org> <55FA8C14.3020000@st.com> <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Gabriel Fernandez , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Srinivas Kandagatla , Patrice Chotard , Russell King , Michael Turquette , Peter Griffin , Pankaj Dev , Olivier Bideau , Geert Uytterhoeven , Fabian Frederick , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@stlinux.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09/17/2015 08:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/17, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> >> On 09/17/2015 12:30 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 09/16, Gabriel Fernandez wrote: >>>> This patch set fixes a kernel crash : >>> [..] >>>> This kernel crash is due to a broken compatibility with this commit: >>>> commit 5eb26c605909 ("ARM: STi: DT: Rename st_pll3200c32_407_c0_x into st_pll3200c32_cx_x") >>> It isn't clear who's supposed to apply this because the To: list >>> is huge. Did you want to take this through arm-soc? If so, feel >>> free to take my acked-by on the second patch. The first patch >>> doesn't even apply to clk tree because the patch introducing the >>> typo didn't go through our tree. >> Indeed Stephen, I see it went through my tree (STi DT). >> So the first patch should be taken through arm-soc. >> The second patch, should be taken through yours I think. >> > Ok. That probably breaks bisectability, but if you're not > worried, I'm not worried. I'm not worried about bisectability indeed, as the first patch is just typo fixes in DT Bindings documentation. Regards, Maxime