From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcrks-0005XK-Om for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:14:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcrko-0008Jb-OJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:14:54 -0400 Received: from smtp.ispras.ru ([83.149.199.79]:52440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zcrko-0008IC-HJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:14:50 -0400 References: <7cd03581b882e28ef904a35a4ce1e374@ispras.ru> <55E859BA.8080502@ispras.ru> <55E93C0E.4000401@ispras.ru> <55E9C90E.8020408@ispras.ru> <55FB3881.5070608@codeaurora.org> From: Sergey Smolov Message-ID: <55FBC817.4040706@ispras.ru> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:15:19 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55FB3881.5070608@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU+Aarch64: in_asm log skips instructions of loop-programs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christopher Covington , Peter Maydell , Richard Henderson Cc: QEMU Developers Hi Christopher, 18.09.2015 02:02, Christopher Covington =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Hi Sergey, > > On 09/04/2015 12:38 PM, Sergey Smolov wrote: >>> 03.09.2015 19:35, Peter Maydell =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>>> On 3 September 2015 at 15:31, Sergey Smolov wrote= : >>>>> Do you think it is possible to implement another QEMU logger which = will >>>>> make a record for every executed block, >>>> Yes (this would just need to disable the TB linking optimisation, >>>> which we've discussed providing a debug toggle for in another >>>> thread). >> Ok, I've implemented a mapping between disassembled forms of instructi= ons and >> executed TBs. >> Now my logger does "loop unrolling" successfully. > This sounds like it solves the same issue as -d nochain but in what's p= robably > a more time efficient manner. Are you able to share your implementation= ? > > Thanks, > Christopher Covington > In which way should I share it? Am I need to create a patch and send it=20 to mailing list? Sergey Smolov