From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] cls_bpf: introduce integrated actions Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:51:34 +0200 Message-ID: <55FC08D6.9050405@iogearbox.net> References: <1442383543-4720-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <1442383543-4720-2-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <55FAB40E.304@mojatatu.com> <55FABC7B.6060502@iogearbox.net> <55FAD9F4.1010603@plumgrid.com> <55FBFFF8.3050101@mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: John Fastabend , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jamal Hadi Salim , Alexei Starovoitov , "David S. Miller" Return-path: Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:55904 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753363AbbIRMvl (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:51:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55FBFFF8.3050101@mojatatu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jamal, On 09/18/2015 02:13 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: ... > The architecture is about small tools that come together to > provide complex processing. ebpf may be the best classifier > today - but by no means the only one or guaranteed that nothing > better will exist for speficic use cases. Yes, I agree, I think nobody claimed that, and it also doesn't limit anyone from their choices of configuration possibilities one can do nowadays. > If there is something in the core that needs improvement > for the benefit of all, then lets do that. Yeah, I think i.e. since the last couple of months that is already happening from various people. Thanks, Daniel