From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:9552 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751418AbbIRNHA (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:07:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] add script to enable audio backport To: Johannes Berg , backports@vger.kernel.org References: <1442526437-22392-1-git-send-email-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <1442526437-22392-3-git-send-email-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> (sfid-20150917_234743_628456_B160EAFA) <1442560633.2168.6.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Message-ID: <55FC0C72.20806@linux.intel.com> (sfid-20150918_150702_483804_E104602D) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:06:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1442560633.2168.6.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 9/18/15 2:17 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:47 -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: >> bash enable_audio.sh will add the required files in copylist >> and patch some of the backport headers >> > I don't think this should be part of backports - the code modifications > shouldn't be necessary, you can add everything to copy-list as it > should be (and run with your own copy-list for just sound), and provide > a defconfig file. > > Scripting really shouldn't be there I think. I guess I misunderstood an earlier email where you wrote "You can submit this part upstream btw - it'll just be disabled in the default copy-list... unless you also submit that upstream" If you are ok to take the patches and have the upstream copy-list include the sound files then yes the script is not necessary. I just wanted to have a first pass that isn't intrusive or breaks all the backports, but simple enough for others to try and test. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in