All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@nomovok.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: xfstests, bad generic tests 009 and 308
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:38:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FC3E0E.9060506@nomovok.com> (raw)

Hi all,

working on arm (32bit arch), kernel 4.1.6.
Looking to find the reason of some bad results on xfstests,

-tests/generic/009
------------------
i get several "all holes" messages

generic/009    [  842.949643] run fstests generic/009 at 2015-09-18 
15:29:36
  - output mismatch (see 
/home/angelo/xfstests/results//generic/009.out.bad)
     --- tests/generic/009.out    2015-09-17 10:54:06.689071257 +0000
     +++ /home/angelo/xfstests/results//generic/009.out.bad 2015-09-18 
15:29:41.412784177 +0000
     @@ -1,79 +1,45 @@
      QA output created by 009
          1. into a hole
     -0: [0..7]: hole
     -1: [8..23]: unwritten
     -2: [24..39]: hole
     +0: [0..39]: hole
      daa100df6e6711906b61c9ab5aa16032

also some other tests are giving the same bad notices.


-tests/generic/308
------------------

I have now: CONFIG_LBDAF=y

In my target device this test creates a 16 Terabytes file 308.tempfile

-rw------- 1 root root  17592186044415 Sep 18 09:40 testfile.308

While "df" is not complaining about:

/dev/mmcblk0p5   8378368   45252   8333116   1% /media/p5

and next rm -f on it hands the cpu to 95%, forever.

This issue seems known from a long time, as it has been discussed in the 
thread:

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00273.html

I was wondering if there was any special reason why the Jeff patch has
never been finally applied.

I applied this patch anyway, and tests pass.

-- 
Best regards,
Angelo Dureghello

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

             reply	other threads:[~2015-09-18 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-18 16:38 Angelo Dureghello [this message]
2015-09-18 22:44 ` xfstests, bad generic tests 009 and 308 Dave Chinner
2015-09-21 11:13   ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-21 11:18     ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-21 22:52     ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-22 12:41       ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-22 21:27         ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-23  9:15           ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-09-23 22:25             ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-23 10:43       ` Yann Dupont - Veille Techno
2015-09-23 22:04         ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-24  8:20           ` Yann Dupont - Veille Techno
2015-09-27  0:40             ` Angelo Dureghello
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-18 16:16 angelo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55FC3E0E.9060506@nomovok.com \
    --to=angelo.dureghello@nomovok.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.