From: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:19:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FF5B08.7010807@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eghtb7e8.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1181 bytes --]
On 9/20/15 6:30 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> commit 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b ("net: Add support for VRFs to inetpeer cache")
>
>
> =========================================================================================
> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/runtime/nr_threads/cluster/test:
> lkp-sbx04/netperf/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/300s/200%/cs-localhost/TCP_CRR
>
> commit:
> 5345c2e12d41f815c1009c9dee72f3d5fcfd4282
> 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b
>
Clarification: The reproduce file shows 128 instances of 'netperf -t
TCP_CRR -c -C -l 300 -H 127.0.0.1' without an '&' on the end. Does that
mean these 128 commands are run serially?
Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and then
adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78 to
192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is it
possible to get this test run on your system comparing those 2 commits?
Thanks,
David
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: lkp@01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:19:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FF5B08.7010807@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eghtb7e8.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
On 9/20/15 6:30 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> commit 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b ("net: Add support for VRFs to inetpeer cache")
>
>
> =========================================================================================
> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/runtime/nr_threads/cluster/test:
> lkp-sbx04/netperf/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/300s/200%/cs-localhost/TCP_CRR
>
> commit:
> 5345c2e12d41f815c1009c9dee72f3d5fcfd4282
> 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b
>
Clarification: The reproduce file shows 128 instances of 'netperf -t
TCP_CRR -c -C -l 300 -H 127.0.0.1' without an '&' on the end. Does that
mean these 128 commands are run serially?
Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and then
adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78 to
192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is it
possible to get this test run on your system comparing those 2 commits?
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-21 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-20 12:30 [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps kernel test robot
2015-09-21 1:19 ` David Ahern [this message]
2015-09-21 1:19 ` [lkp] " David Ahern
2015-09-21 1:33 ` Huang Ying
2015-09-21 1:33 ` [lkp] " Huang Ying
2015-09-21 3:48 ` David Ahern
2015-09-21 3:48 ` [lkp] " David Ahern
2015-09-23 18:06 ` David Ahern
2015-09-23 18:06 ` [lkp] " David Ahern
2015-09-24 0:37 ` Huang Ying
2015-09-24 0:37 ` [lkp] " Huang Ying
2015-09-24 3:12 ` David Ahern
2015-09-24 3:12 ` [lkp] " David Ahern
2015-09-29 8:45 ` Huang, Ying
2015-09-29 8:45 ` [lkp] " Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FF5B08.7010807@cumulusnetworks.com \
--to=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.