From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
boqun.feng@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Kconfig.cputype: Disallow TUNE_CELL on LE systems
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:07:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FFD6DF.2080300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442819926.354.5.camel@ellerman.id.au>
On 21/09/15 09:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 16:17 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> It looks somewhat weird that you can enable TUNE_CELL on little
>> endian systems, so let's disable this option with CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> I first thought that it might be better to make this option depend
>> on PPC_CELL instead ... but I guess it's a bad idea to depend a
>> CPU option on a platform option? Alternatively, would it make
>> sense to make it depend on (GENERIC_CPU || CELL_CPU) instead?
>
> Hmm, it's a little backward, but I think it would be fine, and less confusing
> for users. Both PS3 and Cell select PPC_CELL, so it would work in both those
> cases.
It's just that when you step through the kernel config (e.g. with "make
menuconfig"), you normally step through the "Processor support" first,
and then later do the "Platform support". I think most users won't look
back into "Processor support" again once they already reached the
"Platform support" section, so this TUNE_CELL option then might appear
unnoticed when you enable a Cell platform under "Platform support".
That's why thought that CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN or (GENERIC_CPU || CELL_CPU)
might be the better option here... but if you think PPC_CELL is the
better way to go, I'm also fine to change my patch to use this instead
(in the end, TUNE_CELL is likely hardly used anymore nowadays, so it
should not be that bad if it does not appear "immediately" to the user).
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-21 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-18 14:17 [PATCH] powerpc: Kconfig.cputype: Disallow TUNE_CELL on LE systems Thomas Huth
2015-09-21 7:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-21 10:07 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2015-10-06 10:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-06 10:48 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FFD6DF.2080300@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.