From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests] x86: debug: test debug extensions Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:28:55 +0200 Message-ID: <55FFF807.2060700@redhat.com> References: <1442837078-25970-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <2C1CF13B-2A74-4F81-B2F3-843E12B58D6C@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net, ehabkost@redhat.com To: Nadav Amit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49055 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756542AbbIUM26 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:28:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2C1CF13B-2A74-4F81-B2F3-843E12B58D6C@gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 21/09/2015 14:26, Nadav Amit wrote: > Paolo, >=20 > Two students here implemented emulated I/O and data breakpoints suppo= rt for > KVM under my supervision. I mistakenly graded their project before th= ey > actually sent the patches, and at this point (surprisingly) they > disappeared. The patches are relatively ok and include unit-tests. I = also > ran some Intel tests to check the patches, which they (eventually) pa= ssed. >=20 > I don=E2=80=99t know if I can find the time to rebase them (they are = based on 3.19), > but let me know if you are interested. Yes, I am. Worst case just send them based on 3.19, I owe you enough bugfixes that I can do the rebase myself. :) Paolo