From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM64: dts: exynos5433: add jpeg node Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:55:28 +0200 Message-ID: <55FFFE40.8070801@samsung.com> References: <1442586060-23657-1-git-send-email-andrzej.p@samsung.com> <1442586060-23657-5-git-send-email-andrzej.p@samsung.com> <55FFD2D2.1010508@xs4all.nl> <55FFD4FF.6090306@samsung.com> <20150921084133.175b1bda@recife.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20150921084133.175b1bda@recife.lan> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Hans Verkuil , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jacek Anaszewski , Kukjin Kim , Marek Szyprowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Krzysztof Kozlowski List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Hi Mauro, W dniu 21.09.2015 o 13:41, Mauro Carvalho Chehab pisze: >>> >>> I think the media subsystem can take patches 1-3 and whoever does DT patches can >>> take this patch, right? >>> >> >> The cover letter explains that the series is rebased onto Mauro's >> master with Kukjin's branch merged. The latter does contain >> the exynos5433.dtsi. That said, yes, taking patches 1-3 in >> media subsystem and leaving DT patch to someone else is the >> way to go. > > I'm ok with such strategy, provided that the new driver builds fine with > COMPILE_TEST without the need of the dtsi patch. > I've checked. It does compile with COMPILE_TEST. > Please also notice that, if the driver uses MC, it has to wait for > the MC next gen support to be merged, No, it does not. It is a rather simple mem2mem device. Sylwester has answered about camera support which is a different topic. Andrzej From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrzej.p@samsung.com (Andrzej Pietrasiewicz) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:55:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ARM64: dts: exynos5433: add jpeg node In-Reply-To: <20150921084133.175b1bda@recife.lan> References: <1442586060-23657-1-git-send-email-andrzej.p@samsung.com> <1442586060-23657-5-git-send-email-andrzej.p@samsung.com> <55FFD2D2.1010508@xs4all.nl> <55FFD4FF.6090306@samsung.com> <20150921084133.175b1bda@recife.lan> Message-ID: <55FFFE40.8070801@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mauro, W dniu 21.09.2015 o 13:41, Mauro Carvalho Chehab pisze: >>> >>> I think the media subsystem can take patches 1-3 and whoever does DT patches can >>> take this patch, right? >>> >> >> The cover letter explains that the series is rebased onto Mauro's >> master with Kukjin's branch merged. The latter does contain >> the exynos5433.dtsi. That said, yes, taking patches 1-3 in >> media subsystem and leaving DT patch to someone else is the >> way to go. > > I'm ok with such strategy, provided that the new driver builds fine with > COMPILE_TEST without the need of the dtsi patch. > I've checked. It does compile with COMPILE_TEST. > Please also notice that, if the driver uses MC, it has to wait for > the MC next gen support to be merged, No, it does not. It is a rather simple mem2mem device. Sylwester has answered about camera support which is a different topic. Andrzej