From: Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@windriver.com>
To: Scott Murray <scott.murray@konsulko.com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, stephane.desneux@iot.bzh,
jsmoeller@linuxfoundation.org,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, anuj.mittal@intel.com,
david.zuhn@sonos.com
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rng-tools: move to meta-oe
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 19:45:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55fa276d-e6e2-4cc1-b4fa-660356889665@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8554634-5da9-9872-660a-5e94a62c765e@konsulko.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4127 bytes --]
On 2024-01-15 4:50 p.m., Scott Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Randy MacLeod via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>
>> On 2024-01-15 11:58 a.m., Alexandre Belloni via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>>> This is breaking meta-agl-core until this gets into meta-oe:
>>>
>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/120/builds/3849/steps/14/logs/stdio
>> Thanks Alexandre.
>>
>>
>> Stephane, Jan-Simon,
>>
>> Is rng-tools actually still a requirement for meta-agl ?
>> It was added back in 2018 but the kernel algorithm improved as of 5.6:
>> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/178518
> The kernel no longer blocking does mean things won't get stuck on boot,
> but it seems like any distro with an eye towards security still needs
> either rngd or haveged present to feed in entropy on hardware that does
> not have a hardware RNG (and potentially even when there is a hardware
> RNG to improve the quality of the pool). We definitely support some
> platforms in AGL that do not have a hardware RNG, so we'll have to work
> out whether we're going to need to eat making meta-oe a hard requirement
> for using meta-agl-core or do something else.
For anyone who missed it...
We restored rng-tools in oe-core as described here:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=828afafb3bff54079fcba9bdab2ec87ac13e4ce6
Scott,
Any news on a qemu/HW boot test case?
Testing randomness is a little different as described in my notes below.
If anyone has some expertise in this area, please help!
There are a few tests in rng-tools, that could be wrapped in ptest:
❯ ls tests/
Makefile.am rngtestjitter.sh rngtesturandom.sh rngtestzero.sh
I haven't played with rngtest much but I was wondering how we'd even
construct a test of randomness that would *always* pass.
The example below shows that if you run runtest with a blockcount of
10,000, and do that 10 times, you get failures some of the time:
❯ for i in `seq 10`; do cat /dev/urandom | rngtest -c 10000 --pipe 2>&1
>/dev/null |rg failures; done
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 6
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 5
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 9
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 4
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 6
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 8
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 9
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 11
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 9
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 5
We could say that we accept up to 20 failures but even then, there would
be a chance that the YP AB would
occasionally see that fail due the the inherit randomness being tested.
If I run the test 1000 times you can see that on my laptop (6.6.10), 20
failures never happens:
❯ cut -d":" -f3 /tmp/rt.log | sort -n | uniq -c
3 1
7 2
34 3
54 4
101 5
131 6
138 7
124 8
114 9
101 10
75 11
48 12
36 13
16 14
10 15
6 16
1 17
1 19
and on an older headless server running 5.15 with fewer process and
likely less entropy available:
2 1
12 2
29 3
60 4
95 5
117 6
133 7
121 8
139 9
99 10
81 11
50 12
28 13
14 14
9 15
5 16
4 17
2 20
I guess we could raise the limit to ~30 (42!) and failures would be
extremely unlikely.
We would have a similar problem with measuring the boot time that is
dependent on the entropy pool not being depleted
since we can't completely rule out a boot sequence taking 3x as long as
the average time
and it would be worse in qemu given that it's competing with other
processes on the YP AB machines!
../Randy "It's a good day because I made some graphs to understand a
problem." MacLeod
>
> Scott
>
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 7159 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.2: v6jmaP3xqLBLr8JU.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 19258 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-10 20:25 [PATCH] rng-tools: move to meta-oe Randy.MacLeod
2024-01-15 16:58 ` [OE-core] " Alexandre Belloni
2024-01-15 20:20 ` Randy MacLeod
2024-01-15 21:17 ` Khem Raj
2024-01-15 21:50 ` Scott Murray
2024-02-09 0:45 ` Randy MacLeod [this message]
2024-02-13 15:25 ` Scott Murray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55fa276d-e6e2-4cc1-b4fa-660356889665@windriver.com \
--to=randy.macleod@windriver.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=anuj.mittal@intel.com \
--cc=david.zuhn@sonos.com \
--cc=jsmoeller@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=scott.murray@konsulko.com \
--cc=stephane.desneux@iot.bzh \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.